Logged-in users can hide comments and words in comments they do not
want to see. Click here to register for
your free account. If you already have an account,
log in here.
You are about to report the following comment as abusive:
Vincent
September 23, 2010, 10:40am
Under the constitution and tax case law, taxes should match state benefits provided. (Complete Auto case). States are taxing without providing benefits. A market for a product and enforcement of other state judgments in court for collection are not state benefits. A market is there b/c we are a capitalist society and it must be provided and access to court systems for judgments in other states are part of the full faith and credit clause. A state cannot ask for payment from out of state companies with no physical presence in the state for such things they are obligated to provide in order to be a state.
Report Abuse
Logged-in users can hide comments and words in comments they do not want to see. Click here to register for your free account. If you already have an account, log in here.
You are about to report the following comment as abusive:
Vincent
September 23, 2010, 10:40amUnder the constitution and tax case law, taxes should match state benefits provided. (Complete Auto case). States are taxing without providing benefits. A market for a product and enforcement of other state judgments in court for collection are not state benefits. A market is there b/c we are a capitalist society and it must be provided and access to court systems for judgments in other states are part of the full faith and credit clause. A state cannot ask for payment from out of state companies with no physical presence in the state for such things they are obligated to provide in order to be a state.