<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The WashingtonWatch.com Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog</link>
	<description>News, Commentary, and What to Watch on WashingtonWatch.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WashingtonWatch.com Digest &#8211; May 21, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/21/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-21-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/21/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-21-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Week Ahead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of May 21, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter &#124; tell a friend &#124; wiki &#124; about &#124; home &#124; log in On the Blog: Stop the Spending Cuts! House Republicans added an amendment to national defense legislation last week that would restore military spending that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of May 21, 2012. Subscribe (free!) <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/">here</a>.</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td style="border:1px solid #d9e4ea; margin:0px; padding:0px; color:#142535; font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;" width="550"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/top.jpg" border="0"/></a>
<div style="border-bottom:1px solid #d9e4ea; text-align:center; font-size:10px; padding:3px 0px 5px 0px; background:#ecf1f5; color:#003369;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">email newsletter</a> | <a href="mailto:?subject=Visit WashingtonWatch.com&amp;body=I have discovered WashingtonWatch.com (http://www.washingtonwatch.com) and want you to know about this unique resource for information on government spending, taxation, and regulation.  Please take a look and tell me what you think." target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">tell a friend</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/wiki/tutorial/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">wiki</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/about/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">about</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">home</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/account/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">log in</a></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:15px 20px 15px 20px;">
<tr>
<td colspan='2'>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">On the Blog: Stop the Spending Cuts!</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 15px 0px; font-size:12px;">House Republicans added an amendment to national defense legislation last week that would restore military spending that might be cut. The thing is, the cuts were part of an agreement to control the deficit.</p>
<p>Read about it in a post entitled: &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/21/going-back-on-the-budget-control-deal/">Going Back on the Budget Control Deal</a>.&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-right:20px;" valign="top">
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Featured Item</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 15px 0px; font-size:12px;">This week, the House will not meet.</p>
<p>The Senate will debate <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_3187.html">S. 3187, the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act</a>.</p>
<p>The bill would revise and extend the user-fee programs for prescription drugs and medical devices, to establish user-fee programs for generic drugs and biosimilars.</p>
<p>There is no cost estimate for <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_3187.html">S. 3187</a> yet.</p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_3187.html" target="_blank">S. 3187</a></strong><br/>The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act<br/></p>
</td>
<td style="width:120px; border-left:1px solid #d9e4ea; padding-left:20px;" valign="top">
<p style="text-align:center; font-size:12px; color:#2c404b; padding-right:5px; margin:0px 0px 5px 0px;"><strong>What People Think</strong></p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; height:100px;" bgcolor="#ecf1f5">
<tr>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_3187.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/agree.gif" height="50" border="0" title="Click here to vote on The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act." alt="Click here to vote on The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:11px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_3187.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/disagree.gif" height="50" border="0" title="Click here to vote on The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act." alt="Click here to vote on The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; width: 120px; margin-left: 10px;height:100px;">
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align:center; font-size:10px; color:#2c404b; padding-right:5px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_3187.html" target="_blank">The Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act</a><br/>50% For, 50% Against <br/><br/><span style="font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_3187.html" target="_new" style="text-decoration:none;">Vote on this Bill</a></span></strong>
<div style="padding-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;">	<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/yea/200537334.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/for.gif" border="0"/></a><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/nay/200537334.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/against.gif" border="0" /></a></div>
</p>
</td>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px 20px 0px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<p style="margin:8px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;">Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.</p>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">New Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_3985.html" target="_blank">H.R. 3985</a></strong><br/>The Building Better Business Partnerships Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $0.05 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4005.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4005</a></strong><br/>The GAPS Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.01 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4363.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4363</a></strong><br/>The Federal Employee Phased Retirement Act<br/><strong>Saves $3.67 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_460.html" target="_blank">H.R. 460</a></strong><br/>The Bonneville Unit Clean Hydropower Facilitation Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.13 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_1272.html" target="_blank">H.R. 1272</a></strong><br/>The Minnesota Chippewa Tribe Judgment Fund Distribution Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4203.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4203</a></strong><br/>The Women&#8217;s Procurement Program Improvement Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $1.29 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_414.html" target="_blank">S. 414</a></strong><br/>The International Protecting Girls by Preventing Child Marriage Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.20 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_657.html" target="_blank">S. 657</a></strong><br/>The National Blue Alert Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.31 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2446.html" target="_blank">H.R. 2446</a></strong><br/>The RESPA Home Warranty Clarification Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.08 per family</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:10px 20px 0px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Updated Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4310.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4310</a></strong><br/>The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013<br/><strong>Costs $5,889.77 per family</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:10px 20px 10px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Passed Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-107.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-107</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 500 East Whitestone Boulevard in Cedar Park, Texas, as the &#8220;Army Specialist Matthew Troy Morris Post Office Building&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-108.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-108</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, as the &#8220;Specialist Micheal E. Phillips Post Office&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-109.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-109</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10 Main Street in East Rockaway, New York, as the &#8220;John J. Cook Post Office&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-110.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-110</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 801 West Eastport Street in Iuka, Mississippi, as the &#8220;Sergeant Jason W. Vaughn Post Office&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-111.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-111</a></strong><br/>The Veterans Missing in America Act of 2012<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-112.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-112</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 122 North Holderrieth Boulevard in Tomball, Texas, as the &#8220;Tomball Veterans Post Office&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-113.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-113</a></strong><br/>The Brian A. Terry Memorial Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-114.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-114</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8 West Silver Street in Westfield, Massachusetts, as the &#8220;William T. Trant Post Office Building&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-116.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-116</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 15455 Manchester Road in Ballwin, Missouri, as the &#8220;Specialist Peter J. Navarro Post Office Building&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-115.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-115</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 260 California Drive in Yountville, California, as the &#8220;Private First Class Alejandro R. Ruiz Post Office Building&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-117.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-117</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1100 Town and Country Commons in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the &#8220;Lance Corporal Matthew P. Pathenos Post Office Building&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-118.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-118</a></strong><br/>To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 112 South 5th Street in Saint Charles, Missouri, as the &#8220;Lance Corporal Drew W. Weaver Post Office Building&#8221;<br/></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-119.html" target="_blank">P.L. 112-119</a></strong><br/>A bill to authorize the Administrator of General Services to convey a parcel of real property in Tracy, California, to the City of Tracy<br/><strong>Costs $0.01 per family</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="border-top:1px solid #d9e4ea; border-top:1px solid #d9e4ea; text-align:center; font-size:10px; padding:5px 0px 7px 0px; background:#9d0004; color:white;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/" style="color:white;">email newsletter</a> | <a href="mailto:?subject=Visit WashingtonWatch.com&amp;body=I have discovered WashingtonWatch.com (http://www.washingtonwatch.com) and want you to know about this unique resource for information on government spending, taxation, and regulation.  Please take a look and tell me what you think." style="color:white;">tell a friend</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/wiki/tutorial/" style="color:white;">wiki</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/about/" style="color:white;">about</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" style="color:white;">home</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/privacy/" style="color:white;">privacy</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/contact/" style="color:white;">contact</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/account/" style="color:white;">log in</a></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/21/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-21-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Back on the Budget Control Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/21/going-back-on-the-budget-control-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/21/going-back-on-the-budget-control-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appropriations/Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Control Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Budget Control Act, congressional Republicans made a deal with the president and Senate Democrats. It was a complex deal, but it included creating a &#8220;Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction,&#8221; also known as the &#8220;super committee.&#8221; The super committee was supposed to produce debt reduction legislation by Thanksgiving, 2011, which would cut at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/cleaver-cuts.jpg" alt="" title="cleaver cuts" width="468" height="312" align="right" />In the <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_PL_112-25.html">Budget Control Act</a>, congressional Republicans made a deal with the president and Senate Democrats. It was a complex deal, but it included creating a &#8220;Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction,&#8221; also known as the &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2011/11/21/lets-make-a-deal-or-not/">super committee</a>.&#8221; The super committee was supposed to produce debt reduction legislation by Thanksgiving, 2011, which would cut at least $1.5 trillion over 10 years.</p>
<p>If Congress failed to pass a deficit reduction bill with at least $1.2 trillion in cuts, then Congress could grant a $1.2 trillion increase in the debt ceiling but this would trigger across-the-board cuts in spending. (They&#8217;re calling it &#8220;sequestration.&#8221;) The cuts would be equally split between security and non-security programs.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>&#8220;deficit reduction&#8221; is another way of saying &#8220;<em>spending cuts</em>&#8220;</b></p></blockquote>
<p>The super committee didn&#8217;t come up with anything Congress could pass, and Congress didn&#8217;t pass any bill, so now there are cuts&#8212;er, sequestration&#8212;coming to the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Nuclear Security Administration, and a few other things.</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s something the Republicans didn&#8217;t bargain for!&#8211;other than when they bargained for it&#8212;so now they&#8217;re moving to undo sequestration of defense programs.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4310.html">H.R. 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013</a>, they&#8217;re working to restore money for the military and homeland security. An amendment to <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4310.html">H.R. 4310</a> that the Republicans added says: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Any sequestration order issued by the President under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to carry out reductions to direct spending for the defense function (050) for fiscal year 2013 pursuant to section 251A of such Act shall have no force or effect.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That means big spending on the military stays high!</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t automatically go into effect. Other measures that lower spending elsewhere have to go into effect. We&#8217;ll see what happens there.</p>
<p>Rep. Scott Rigell had some interesting things to say in a <a href="http://rigell.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=296121">press release</a> touting the anti-sequestration amendment. </p>
<blockquote><p>“The current sequestration model represents an 8-12 percent cut in defense spending – a violent reduction that will devastate our military and the industries that support it. My amendment opens an avenue to stop those cuts for 2013,” said Rigell. “Ten cents of every defense dollar in the Pentagon’s budget is spent in Virginia, and 20 percent of all jobs in Virginia are dependent on military spending,” said Rigell.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, Virginia, you&#8217;re welcome for hoovering up all those tax dollars. You might have to hoover up a little bit less if &#8220;sequestration&#8221; happens. But maybe America&#8217;s leaders are going back on the budget control deal.</p>
<p>The next budget control deal is coming soon. House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) says that when the country next reaches its debt limit, he&#8217;s going to require spending cuts as part of the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/21/going-back-on-the-budget-control-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re Not Great if We&#8217;re Not Up in Space!</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/16/were-not-great-if-were-not-up-in-space/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/16/were-not-great-if-were-not-up-in-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American exceptionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H. Con. Res. 124 would express the sense of the Congress that President Obama&#8217;s delays in implementing a clear mission for the American space program represent a clear threat to American exceptionalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HC_124.html">H. Con. Res. 124</a> would express the sense of the Congress that President Obama&#8217;s delays in implementing a clear mission for the American space program represent a clear threat to American exceptionalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/16/were-not-great-if-were-not-up-in-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WashingtonWatch.com Digest &#8211; May 14, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/14/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-14-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/14/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-14-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Week Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of May 14, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter &#124; tell a friend &#124; wiki &#124; about &#124; home &#124; log in On the Blog: The Violence Against Women Act The Senate has already passed a bill, and the House will debate a bill to reauthorize [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of May 14, 2012. Subscribe (free!) <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/">here</a>.</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td style="border:1px solid #d9e4ea; margin:0px; padding:0px; color:#142535; font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;" width="550"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/top.jpg" border="0"/></a>
<div style="border-bottom:1px solid #d9e4ea; text-align:center; font-size:10px; padding:3px 0px 5px 0px; background:#ecf1f5; color:#003369;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">email newsletter</a> | <a href="mailto:?subject=Visit WashingtonWatch.com&amp;body=I have discovered WashingtonWatch.com (http://www.washingtonwatch.com) and want you to know about this unique resource for information on government spending, taxation, and regulation.  Please take a look and tell me what you think." target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">tell a friend</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/wiki/tutorial/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">wiki</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/about/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">about</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">home</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/account/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">log in</a></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:15px 20px 15px 20px;">
<tr>
<td colspan='2'>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">On the Blog: The Violence Against Women Act</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 15px 0px; font-size:12px;">The Senate has already passed a bill, and the House will debate a bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act this week. The politics are in favor of the bill becoming law.</p>
<p>Read about it in a post entitled: &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/13/everyones-against-violence-against-women/">Everyone&#8217;s Against Violence Against Women</a>.&#8221;	</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong>(<forwardtoafriend>forward to a friend</forwardtoafriend>)</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-right:20px;" valign="top">
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Featured Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 15px 0px; font-size:12px;">This week, the House will debate <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html">H.R. 4970, the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012</a>.</p>
<p>The bill spends money on Department of Justice and Health and Human Services programs meant to reduce violence against women and aid in the prosecution of violence against women.</p>
<p>Passage of <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html">H.R. 4970</a> would cost the average U.S. family about $16.50.</p>
<p>The Senate will debate <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2072.html">H.R. 2072, the Securing American Jobs Through Exports Act of 2011</a>.</p>
<p>The bill would extend through 2015 the authority of the Export-Import Bank of the United States to provide loans and insurance to finance exports of U.S. products and services.</p>
<p>Passage of <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2072.html">H.R. 2072</a> would cost the average U.S. family about $14.50.</p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4970</a></strong><br/>The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $16.60 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2072.html" target="_blank">H.R. 2072</a></strong><br/>The Securing American Jobs Through Exports Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $14.59 per family</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="width:120px; border-left:1px solid #d9e4ea; padding-left:20px;" valign="top">
<p style="text-align:center; font-size:12px; color:#2c404b; padding-right:5px; margin:0px 0px 5px 0px;"><strong>What People Think</strong></p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; height:100px;" bgcolor="#ecf1f5">
<tr>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/agree.gif" height="50" border="0" title="Click here to vote on The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012." alt="Click here to vote on The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:11px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/disagree.gif" height="50" border="0" title="Click here to vote on The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012." alt="Click here to vote on The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; width: 120px; margin-left: 10px;height:100px;">
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align:center; font-size:10px; color:#2c404b; padding-right:5px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html" target="_blank">The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012</a><br/>50% For, 50% Against <br/><br/><span style="font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html" target="_new" style="text-decoration:none;">Vote on this Bill</a></span></strong>
<div style="padding-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;">	<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/yea/200535804.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/for.gif" border="0"/></a><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/nay/200535804.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/against.gif" border="0" /></a></div>
</p>
</td>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; height:100px;" bgcolor="#ecf1f5">
<tr>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2072.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/agree.gif" height="30" border="0" title="Click here to vote on The Securing American Jobs Through Exports Act of 2011." alt="Click here to vote on The Securing American Jobs Through Exports Act of 2011." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:11px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2072.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/disagree.gif" height="70" border="0" title="Click here to vote on The Securing American Jobs Through Exports Act of 2011." alt="Click here to vote on The Securing American Jobs Through Exports Act of 2011." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; width: 120px; margin-left: 10px;height:100px;">
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align:center; font-size:10px; color:#2c404b; padding-right:5px;">	<strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2072.html" target="_blank">The Securing American Jobs Through Exports Act of 2011</a><br/>30% For, 70% Against <br/><br/><span style="font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2072.html" target="_new" style="text-decoration:none;">Vote on this Bill</a></span></strong>
<div style="padding-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;">	<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/yea/200530797.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/for.gif" border="0"/></a><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/nay/200530797.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/against.gif" border="0" /></a></div>
</p>
</td>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px 20px 0px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<p style="margin:8px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;">Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.</p>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">New Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2764.html" target="_blank">H.R. 2764</a></strong><br/>The WMD Intelligence and Information Sharing Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4310.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4310</a></strong><br/>The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013<br/><strong>Saves $1.34 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4970</a></strong><br/>The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $16.60 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2516.html" target="_blank">S. 2516</a></strong><br/>An original bill to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to revise and extend the user-fee programs for prescription drugs and medical devices, to establish user-fee programs for generic drugs and biosimilars, and for other purposes<br/><strong>Costs $115.78 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_365.html" target="_blank">H.R. 365</a></strong><br/>The National Blue Alert Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.31 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_1237.html" target="_blank">H.R. 1237</a></strong><br/>To provide for a land exchange with the Trinity Public Utilities District of Trinity County, California, involving the transfer of land to the Bureau of Land Management and the Six Rivers National Forest in exchange for National Forest System land in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest, and for other purposes<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_1763.html" target="_blank">S. 1763</a></strong><br/>The SAVE Native Women Act<br/><strong>Costs $1.71 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_3670.html" target="_blank">H.R. 3670</a></strong><br/>To require the Transportation Security Administration to comply with the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4201.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4201</a></strong><br/>The Servicemember Family Protection Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4607.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4607</a></strong><br/>The Midnight Rule Relief Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4206.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4206</a></strong><br/>The Contracting Oversight for Small Business Jobs Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $0.02 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4114.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4114</a></strong><br/>The Veterans&#8217; Compensation Cost-of-Living Adjustment Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $219.91 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2008.html" target="_blank">H.R. 2008</a></strong><br/>The Keeping Politics Out of Federal Contracting Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2621.html" target="_blank">H.R. 2621</a></strong><br/>The Chimney Rock National Monument Establishment Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_3987.html" target="_blank">H.R. 3987</a></strong><br/>The Small Business Protection Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $0.11 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4966.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4966</a></strong><br/>The Sequester Replacement Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2224.html" target="_blank">S. 2224</a></strong><br/>A bill to require the President to report to Congress on issues related to Syria<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2375.html" target="_blank">S. 2375</a></strong><br/>The Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013<br/><strong>Costs $1,297.88 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2465.html" target="_blank">S. 2465</a></strong><br/>The Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013<br/><strong>Costs $394.80 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2343.html" target="_blank">S. 2343</a></strong><br/>The Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $82.12 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2322.html" target="_blank">S. 2322</a></strong><br/>The Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013<br/><strong>Costs $1,109.72 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2323.html" target="_blank">S. 2323</a></strong><br/>An original bill making appropriations for Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, and for other purposes<br/><strong>Costs $612.25 per family</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:10px 20px 0px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Updated Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_363.html" target="_blank">S. 363</a></strong><br/>A bill to authorize the Secretary of Commerce to convey property of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to the City of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and for other purposes<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:10px 20px 10px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Passed Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;">none</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="border-top:1px solid #d9e4ea; border-top:1px solid #d9e4ea; text-align:center; font-size:10px; padding:5px 0px 7px 0px; background:#9d0004; color:white;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/" style="color:white;">email newsletter</a> | <a href="mailto:?subject=Visit WashingtonWatch.com&amp;body=I have discovered WashingtonWatch.com (http://www.washingtonwatch.com) and want you to know about this unique resource for information on government spending, taxation, and regulation.  Please take a look and tell me what you think." style="color:white;">tell a friend</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/wiki/tutorial/" style="color:white;">wiki</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/about/" style="color:white;">about</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" style="color:white;">home</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/privacy/" style="color:white;">privacy</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/contact/" style="color:white;">contact</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/account/" style="color:white;">log in</a></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/14/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-14-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everyone&#8217;s Against Violence Against Women</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/13/everyones-against-violence-against-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/13/everyones-against-violence-against-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office on Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So everyone&#8217;s in favor of the Violence Against Women Act, right? A bill to reauthorize the law goes to the House floor this week. The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 was signed by President Bill Clinton. The Act provided $1.6 billion toward investigation and prosecution of violent crimes against women, imposed automatic and mandatory [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/violence-against-women.jpg" alt="" title="violence against women" width="276" height="276" align="right" />So everyone&#8217;s in favor of the Violence Against Women Act, right?</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html">bill to reauthorize</a> the law goes to the House floor this week. </p>
<p>The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 was signed by President Bill Clinton. The Act provided $1.6 billion toward investigation and prosecution of violent crimes against women, imposed automatic and mandatory restitution on people convicted of violence against women, and allowed civil suits in cases prosecutors chose to leave unprosecuted. The Act also established the <a href="http://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/" target="_new">Office on Violence Against Women</a> within the Department of Justice.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html">reauthorization bill</a> would authorize spending of about $660 million annually over fiscal 2013-2017 for programs in the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services. Most of that is for Justice Department grants to state, local, and tribal governments and nonprofit organizations for programs to reduce violence against women and to provide legal assistance for victims, outreach services for victims of rural domestic violence, and training for investigators and prosecutors of sexual assault crimes. HHS grants would go for rape prevention and education programs, programs to educate health professionals who address domestic violence and other crimes, and &#8220;collaborative grants&#8221; to assist homeless victims.</p>
<p>In addition, <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4970.html">H.R. 4970</a> would establish new federal crimes and broaden the coverage of existing crimes relating to violence against women. Finally, the bill would reduce the number of immigrants who can get legal permanent resident status based on their U visas, which are issued to people who were victims of specified crimes and who are assisting or are expected to assist law enforcement officials in the investigation and prosecution of those crimes.</p>
<p>The quick summary? The bill spends about $16 per U.S. family.</p>
<p>Of course, our politicians are <a href="http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/domestic-violence-bill-now-political-battleground/540236">fighting over the bill</a>. Republicans are moving a different bill than <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_1925.html">the one the Senate passed in April</a>. The Democrats say thats part of a Republican &#8220;war on women.&#8221; </p>
<p>Voting against the Violence Against Women Act seems like about the meanest thing a person could do, just given the name. So watch for this bill to pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/13/everyones-against-violence-against-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WashingtonWatch.com Digest &#8211; May 7, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/07/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-7-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/07/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-7-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Week Ahead]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of May 7, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter &#124; tell a friend &#124; wiki &#124; about &#124; home &#124; log in On the Blog: FY 2013 Spending Underway The House and Senate have begun work on the annual spending bills for fiscal year 2013. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of May 7, 2012. Subscribe (free!) <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/">here</a>.<br />
<table>
<tr>
<td style="border:1px solid #d9e4ea; margin:0px; padding:0px; color:#142535; font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;" width="550"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/top.jpg" border="0"/></a>
<div style="border-bottom:1px solid #d9e4ea; text-align:center; font-size:10px; padding:3px 0px 5px 0px; background:#ecf1f5; color:#003369;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">email newsletter</a> | <a href="mailto:?subject=Visit WashingtonWatch.com&amp;body=I have discovered WashingtonWatch.com (http://www.washingtonwatch.com) and want you to know about this unique resource for information on government spending, taxation, and regulation.  Please take a look and tell me what you think." target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">tell a friend</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/wiki/tutorial/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">wiki</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/about/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">about</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">home</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/account/" target="_blank" style="color:#003369;">log in</a></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:15px 20px 15px 20px;">
<tr>
<td colspan='2'>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">On the Blog: FY 2013 Spending Underway</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 15px 0px; font-size:12px;">The House and Senate have begun work on the annual spending bills for fiscal year 2013. The Senate has twice as many bills in process, but it has provided us half the information about them so far.</p>
<p>Read about it in a post entitled: &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/06/and-theyre-off-fy-2013-spending/">And They&#8217;re Off! FY 2013 Spending</a>.&#8221;</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding-right:20px;" valign="top">
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Featured Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 15px 0px; font-size:12px;">This week, the House will debate <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html">H.R. 5326, the Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013</a>. The bill spends money on the operation of the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and on science-related programs.</p>
<p>Passage of <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html">H.R. 5326</a> would spend about $600 per U.S. family.</p>
<p>The Senate will debate <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2343.html">S. 2343, the Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012</a>. The bill would keep the interest rate on federally subsidized student loans low, at 3.4 percent, for another year.</p>
<p>Passage of <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2343.html">S. 2343</a> would cost about $82 per U.S. family.</p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html" target="_blank">H.R. 5326</a></strong><br/>Making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, and for other purposes<br/><strong>Costs $608.09 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2343.html" target="_blank">S. 2343</a></strong><br/>The Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $82.13 per family</strong></p>
</td>
<td style="width:120px; border-left:1px solid #d9e4ea; padding-left:20px;" valign="top">
<p style="text-align:center; font-size:12px; color:#2c404b; padding-right:5px; margin:0px 0px 5px 0px;"><strong>What People Think</strong></p>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; height:100px;" bgcolor="#ecf1f5">
<tr>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/agree.gif" height="50" border="0" title="Click here to vote on H.R. 5326." alt="Click here to vote on H.R. 5326." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:11px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/disagree.gif" height="50" border="0" title="Click here to vote on H.R. 5326." alt="Click here to vote on H.R. 5326." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; width: 120px; margin-left: 10px;height:100px;">
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align:center; font-size:10px; color:#2c404b; padding-right:5px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html" target="_blank">H.R. 5326</a><br/>50% For, 50% Against <br/><br/><span style="font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html" target="_new" style="text-decoration:none;">Vote on this Bill</a></span></strong>
<div style="padding-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/yea/200536169.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/for.gif" border="0"/></a><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/nay/200536169.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/against.gif" border="0" /></a></div>
</p>
</td>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; height:100px;" bgcolor="#ecf1f5">
<tr>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2343.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/agree.gif" height="33" border="0" title="Click here to vote on The Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012." alt="Click here to vote on The Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:11px;"></td>
<td style="width:45px;" valign="bottom"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2343.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/disagree.gif" height="67" border="0" title="Click here to vote on The Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012." alt="Click here to vote on The Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012." width="45"/></a></td>
<td style="width:22px;"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px auto; width: 120px; margin-left: 10px;height:100px;">
<tr>
<td>
<p style="text-align:center; font-size:10px; color:#2c404b; padding-right:5px;">	<strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2343.html" target="_blank">The Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012</a><br/>33% For, 67% Against <br/><br/><span style="font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2343.html" target="_new" style="text-decoration:none;">Vote on this Bill</a></span></strong>
<div style="padding-bottom: 10px; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/yea/200535265.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/for.gif" border="0"/></a><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/vote/nay/200535265.html" target="_new"><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/info_template/images/against.gif" border="0" /></a></div>
</p>
</td>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:0px 20px 0px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<p style="margin:8px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;">Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.</p>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">New Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2489.html" target="_blank">H.R. 2489</a></strong><br/>The American Battlefield Protection Program Amendments Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.31 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_3409.html" target="_blank">H.R. 3409</a></strong><br/>The Coal Miner Employment and Domestic Energy Infrastructure Protection Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_1998.html" target="_blank">S. 1998</a></strong><br/>The Department of Homeland Security Improved Financial Accountability Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2061.html" target="_blank">S. 2061</a></strong><br/>The Former Charleston Naval Base Land Exchange Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_3874.html" target="_blank">H.R. 3874</a></strong><br/>The Black Hills Cemetery Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5325.html" target="_blank">H.R. 5325</a></strong><br/>Making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, and for other purposes<br/><strong>Costs $390.74 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html" target="_blank">H.R. 5326</a></strong><br/>Making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, and for other purposes<br/><strong>Costs $608.09 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_3783.html" target="_blank">H.R. 3783</a></strong><br/>The Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act of 2012<br/><strong>Costs $0.15 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_538.html" target="_blank">H.R. 538</a></strong><br/>The Federal Customer Service Enhancement Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_925.html" target="_blank">S. 925</a></strong><br/>The Mt. Andrea Lawrence Designation Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_1818.html" target="_blank">H.R. 1818</a></strong><br/>The Mt. Andrea Lawrence Designation Act of 2011<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_3283.html" target="_blank">H.R. 3283</a></strong><br/>The Swap Jurisdiction Certainty Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.01 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_3902.html" target="_blank">H.R. 3902</a></strong><br/>The District of Columbia Special Election Reform Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_4235.html" target="_blank">H.R. 4235</a></strong><br/>To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Commodity Exchange Act to repeal the indemnification requirements for regulatory authorities to obtain access to swap data required to be provided by swaps entities under such Acts<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:10px 20px 0px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Updated Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_1016.html" target="_blank">H.R. 1016</a></strong><br/>The Assessing Progress in Haiti Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2668.html" target="_blank">H.R. 2668</a></strong><br/>The Brian A. Terry Memorial Act<br/><strong>Costs $0.00 per family</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/newsletter/divider.jpg"><br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin:10px 20px 10px 20px;">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 style="color:#0b80f1; margin:0px 0px 8px 0px;">Passed Items</h2>
<p style="margin:0px 0px 10px 0px; font-size:12px;">none</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="border-top:1px solid #d9e4ea; border-top:1px solid #d9e4ea; text-align:center; font-size:10px; padding:5px 0px 7px 0px; background:#9d0004; color:white;"><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/subscribe/" style="color:white;">email newsletter</a> | <a href="mailto:?subject=Visit WashingtonWatch.com&amp;body=I have discovered WashingtonWatch.com (http://www.washingtonwatch.com) and want you to know about this unique resource for information on government spending, taxation, and regulation.  Please take a look and tell me what you think." style="color:white;">tell a friend</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/wiki/tutorial/" style="color:white;">wiki</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/about/" style="color:white;">about</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/" style="color:white;">home</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/privacy/" style="color:white;">privacy</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/contact/" style="color:white;">contact</a> | <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/account/" style="color:white;">log in</a>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/07/washingtonwatch-com-digest-may-7-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And They&#8217;re Off! FY 2013 Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/06/and-theyre-off-fy-2013-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/06/and-theyre-off-fy-2013-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appropriations/Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJS Approps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy and Water Approps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation/HUD Approps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spending season kicks into full gear this week. The House will debate H.R. 5326, which spends money on the operation of the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and on science-related programs. That spending, for fiscal year 2013, adds up to a little over $600 per U.S. family. A second bill is in the House&#8217;s pipeline. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/money.jpg" alt="" title="money" width="240" height="240" align="right" />Spending season kicks into full gear this week. The House will debate <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5326.html">H.R. 5326</a>, which spends money on the operation of the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and on science-related programs. That spending, for fiscal year 2013, adds up to a little over $600 per U.S. family.</p>
<p>A second bill is in the House&#8217;s pipeline. <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5325.html">H.R. 5325</a> spends on energy and water development and related agencies. Its spending adds up to $390 per family.</p>
<p>Not to be outdone, the Senate is moving bills, too. We&#8217;ve seen four bills introduced.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2322.html">S. 2322</a>, the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2323.html">S. 2323</a>, the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2375.html">S. 2375</a>, The Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013; and</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_SN_2465.html">S. 2465</a>, The Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013.</li>
</ul>
<p>The appropriate committee reports haven&#8217;t been filed yet, so we can&#8217;t tell you much these bills spend. Twice as many bills&#8212;half the information. Let&#8217;s say the House and Senate are neck and neck.</p>
<p>Congress is supposed to be done with all twelve annual spending bills by June 30th. That would give the agencies time to plan for the fiscal year&#8217;s beginning, which is on October 1st. They haven&#8217;t done this right in a couple of decades, but they&#8217;re off to a good start so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/06/and-theyre-off-fy-2013-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Because Every Dumb Idea Should Be Illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/04/because-every-dumb-idea-should-be-illegal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/04/because-every-dumb-idea-should-be-illegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 17:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress is considering H.R. 5050, the Social Networking Online Protection Act, which would prohibit employers from requiring or requesting that employees provide a user name, password, or other means for accessing a personal account on a social networking website.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress is considering <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_5050.html">H.R. 5050</a>, the Social Networking Online Protection Act, which would prohibit employers from requiring or requesting that employees provide a user name, password, or other means for accessing a personal account on a social networking website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/04/because-every-dumb-idea-should-be-illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transparency News</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/03/transparency-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/03/transparency-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Becky Sweger of the National Priorities Project has a guest post on the Sunlight Foundation blog going into some of the latest transparency news. And the news is not all that good&#8230; She was kind enough to link to our effort to get YOU to help improve transparency. Thanks, Becky! Now click the link above [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becky Sweger of the <a href="http://nationalpriorities.org/">National Priorities Project</a> has a <a href="http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2012/05/02/federal-spending-transparency-on-the-decline/">guest post on the Sunlight Foundation blog</a> going into some of the latest transparency news. And the news is not all that good&#8230;</p>
<p>She was kind enough to link to <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/04/30/your-chance-to-advance-government-transparency/">our effort to get YOU to help improve transparency</a>. Thanks, Becky!</p>
<p>Now click the link above so you can weigh in with your representatives about improving government transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/03/transparency-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petition on Fort McClellan Toxic Exposure</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/03/petition-on-fort-mcclellan-toxic-exposure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/03/petition-on-fort-mcclellan-toxic-exposure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort McClellan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=8691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A petition entitled, &#8220;Equal Medical Rights for the Fort McClellan Toxic Exposure Veterans,&#8221; got its start here yesterday, and it already has over 75 signers. Its purpose is to seek passage of a medical and disability bill for service veterans of Fort McClellan, Alabama. That&#8217;s H.R. 2052, The Fort McClellan Health Registry Act. That bill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Fort-McClellan.jpg" alt="" title="Fort McClellan" width="352" height="225" align="right" />A petition entitled, &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/petitions/show/52.html">Equal Medical Rights for the Fort McClellan Toxic Exposure Veterans</a>,&#8221; got its start here yesterday, and it already has over 75 signers.</p>
<p>Its purpose is to seek passage of a medical and disability bill for service veterans of Fort McClellan, Alabama. That&#8217;s <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/112_HR_2052.html">H.R. 2052</a>, The Fort McClellan Health Registry Act. </p>
<p>That bill has plenty of votes and comments, including a fair amount of &#8220;<a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2009/09/07/do-not-feed-the-trolls/">trolling</a>&#8221; from one or more people who don&#8217;t want to see the bill succeed. We&#8217;re big on free speech around here, but you don&#8217;t have to listen, so we&#8217;ve created <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2009/12/28/comment-control-tune-your-hearing-and-turn-your-back/">comment controls for logged-in users</a>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a benefit of petitioning: On petition pages, only petition signers can comment, and the petition creator can exclude commenters who try to be disruptive. </p>
<p>You can <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2011/03/01/announcing-petitions/">learn more about petitions</a>. The <a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/petitions/show/52.html">Fort McClellan toxic exposure veterans&#8217; petition</a> has plenty of information about their side of the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2012/05/03/petition-on-fort-mcclellan-toxic-exposure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

