Home

Blog

Recently Visited

  • Getting bills...

News, Commentary, and What to Watch on WashingtonWatch.com Blog Feed

Sequestration = Scaaarrreeeeee!

Sequestration! Runnnnnn!

That seems to be the reaction of many in Congress and the president to impending across-the-board cuts that will occur March 1st under an agreement that they struck in 2011.

[record scratch sound]

Wait. Republicans and Democrats are running from the agreement they struck in 2011?

Yes, indeed.

Back in mid-2011, Republicans didn’t want to raise the debt ceiling any further without some assurance that spending would come under control, so they bargained with the president for an increase in the debt ceiling and cuts in spending.

In the Budget Control Act, they worked up a plan: They created a “super committee” to try and come up with ideas for cuts. If Congress failed to pass a deficit reduction bill with at least $1.2 trillion in cuts, then Congress could grant a $1.2 trillion increase in the debt ceiling but this would trigger across-the-board cuts in spending (“sequestration”). The cuts would be equally split between security and non-security programs.

The super committee didn’t come up with anything Congress could pass, and Congress didn’t pass any bill, so now there are cuts—er, sequestration—coming to the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Nuclear Security Administration, and a whole bunch of other government agencies.

Sequestration has now drawn near, and many of our political leaders think it’s HORRIBLE!

(We’ve written about them trying to go back on the budget deal once or twice before.)

The reasons are many. One is that people in government and the businesses that sell to government have whipped up a bit of sequestration panic. This Politico story reports, for example, that the Aerospace Industries Association has spent nearly $2 million over the past 18 months trying to generate news stories that will incline Washington, D.C. to stop sequestration.

Congress is responding, and a number of bills have been introduced to delay, replace, or whittle back on the looming threat of sequestration. For example:

S. 277 would get rid of sequestration and “close tax loopholes”—raising revenue by broadening the tax base. So would S. 278. (We’re relying on their summaries here. Being sure that those summaries are accurate would take some study.)

H.R. 505 would “repeal sequester while achieving balance in deficit reduction between revenue and cuts, and between non-defense cuts and defense cuts.” It would also “invest in job creation.” (We sometimes “quote” because we “don’t know what that means.”)

H.R. 607 has a little bit of everything. It would delay until 2016 certain provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and it would delay the application of sequestration until 2014. (Y’ever see someone kick two cans down the road at the same time?)

H.R. 699 would “repeal and replace” sequestration. Perhaps they’re replacing it with a nice shrubbery.

H.R. 729 would exempt the National Institutes of Health from sequestration, reducing the spending cuts to do so. We don’t want health institutes affected by sequestration, do we?

H.R. 773 would exempt the Department of Defense from sequestration, which was—might as well call the whole thing off, if you’re going to do that!

What Congress does, as always, is up to you. Let your own member of Congress and senators know what you think. Put your thinking in the comment sections of these bills. Other people just like you will be looking to see what people like you are saying. Then watch and see what happens. For some in Washington, the coming days are scaaarrreeeeee!

Visitor Comments for Sequestration = Scaaarrreeeeee! RSS 2.0

Jim Johnson

Congress needs to man up and do their job, it is their job to pass a budget, not the President’s job – someone needs to read the Constitution. If Republicans let their dissatisfaction with Obama outweigh common sense they will pay dearly in the next two elections. Grow up and do what you were elected to do or go home and quit taking pay for the job you won’t do.

Margaret Hale

We as individuals can’t spend more than we make so why should Congress keep on spending money that has to be borrowed? We elected the people in Congress to have our best interests at heart. If you can’t do the job, quit and let someone else take your place.

“Friends of Hamas”: Life Imitates Comedy | US Senators

[...] sequestration almost sure to begin this week, and some Americans fear of it matched by other Americans’ exasperation with them, let’s change the subject—to another [...]

It’s All About the CR – The WashingtonWatch.com Blog

[...] Sequestration = Scaaarrreeeeee! [...]

It’s All About the CR | US Senators

[...] will be around the margins. Many House Democrats opposed the bill because it keeps $85 billion sequester in place. Senate Democrats will try to give the Obama administration more flexibility to sequester [...]

Hey, Congress! Think You Passed a Law? We Don’t. – The WashingtonWatch.com Blog

[...] is outrage in some quarters about the bill or bills “passed” last week to side-step sequestration‘s effects on the Federal Aviation Administration. Under the threat of flight delays, the [...]

Hey, Congress! Think You Passed a Law? We Don’t. | US Senators

[...] is outrage in some quarters about the bill or bills “passed” last week to side-step sequestration‘s effects on the Federal Aviation Administration. Under the threat of flight delays, the bills [...]

Congress Misses Their Connection | mef BLOG

[...] is outrage in some quarters about the bill or bills “passed” last week to side-step sequestration‘s effects on the Federal Aviation Administration. Under the threat of flight delays, the bills [...]

The Budget Deal is a Budget Deal and a Spending Deal – The WashingtonWatch.com Blog

[...] the deal eases the limits on spending for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 that had been put in place by sequestration. Assuming spending rises to meet the limits allowed by this budget change, which is a good [...]

The FY 2014 Spending Debate is NOT OVER – The WashingtonWatch.com Blog

[...] for the rest of the 2014 fiscal year and for the 2015 fiscal year, easing up on the constraints of sequestration. As we reported before, the expanded budget will increase spending by roughly $550 per U.S. family, [...]

Add Comment


Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.