<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s a Law We Don&#8217;t Need</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2008/07/16/heres-a-law-we-dont-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2008/07/16/heres-a-law-we-dont-need/</link>
	<description>News, Commentary, and What to Watch on WashingtonWatch.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:37:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Whitlock Company &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You&#8217;ve Got to Be Kidding</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2008/07/16/heres-a-law-we-dont-need/comment-page-1/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>The Whitlock Company &#187; Blog Archive &#187; You&#8217;ve Got to Be Kidding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=73#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>[...] by Jim Harper, March 27, 2009 at 8:07 am   One of my earliest posts on this blog was called &#8220;Here&#8217;s a Law We Don&#8217;t Need,&#8221; and it mocked a bill to ban novelty lighters. A follow-up was called &#8220;Senate Joins [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Jim Harper, March 27, 2009 at 8:07 am   One of my earliest posts on this blog was called &#8220;Here&#8217;s a Law We Don&#8217;t Need,&#8221; and it mocked a bill to ban novelty lighters. A follow-up was called &#8220;Senate Joins [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novelty Lighters is Back! - The WashingtonWatch.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2008/07/16/heres-a-law-we-dont-need/comment-page-1/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>Novelty Lighters is Back! - The WashingtonWatch.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=73#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>[...] of my earliest posts on this blog was called &#8220;Here&#8217;s a Law We Don&#8217;t Need,&#8221; and it mocked a bill to ban novelty lighters. A follow-up was called &#8220;Senate Joins [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of my earliest posts on this blog was called &#8220;Here&#8217;s a Law We Don&#8217;t Need,&#8221; and it mocked a bill to ban novelty lighters. A follow-up was called &#8220;Senate Joins [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The WashingtonWatch.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2008/07/16/heres-a-law-we-dont-need/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>The WashingtonWatch.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=73#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...] a post I titled Here&#8217;s a Law We Don&#8217;t Need, I recently wrote about a bill introduced in the House to ban novelty lighters.  A bill to do the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post I titled Here&#8217;s a Law We Don&#8217;t Need, I recently wrote about a bill introduced in the House to ban novelty lighters.  A bill to do the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2008/07/16/heres-a-law-we-dont-need/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/?p=73#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] it a proper function of government to ban novelty cigarette lighters (&#8221;for the children&#8221;)? &#8211;Special Bonus Question: Do you think that, were he asked, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it a proper function of government to ban novelty cigarette lighters (&#8221;for the children&#8221;)? &#8211;Special Bonus Question: Do you think that, were he asked, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
