Home

Blog

Recently Visited

  • Getting bills...

News, Commentary, and What to Watch on WashingtonWatch.com Blog Feed

More Bills on the House Floor This Week

Beyond the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, discussed in today’s digest, there are just two substantive bills scheduled for consideration in the House this week.

H.R. 3695, known as “Billy’s Law,” would authorize spending for the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System, it would facilitate data sharing between that system and the National Crime Information Center database, as well as providing incentive grants to help facilitate reporting to such systems.

The other bill, called the “Health Insurance Industry Fair Competition Act,” hasn’t been introduced yet. It would evidently make for fair competition in the health insurance industry.

(0 comments | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – February 8, 2010

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of February 8, 2010. Subscribe here.

From the Blog: President Obama’s FY 2011 Budget

Last week, President Obama proposed a budget for the federal government’s 2011 fiscal year, which begins October 1st. Read about the schedule by which FY 2011 spending is supposed to be determined in a blog post entitled: “The FY 2011 Budget Process Begins—$39,000 per Family in Spending.” A more detailed look at where the money would go can be found in: “The President’s Budget—Agency by Agency.”

Featured Item

A light schedule in Congress this week will be even lighter because of the storm that hit Washington, D.C. this weekend.

The House will debate H.R. 2701, the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. The bill would would authorize spending for fiscal year 2010 on the government’s intelligence and intelligence-related activities.

The cost of the bill, which includes only non-classified intelligence programs, is about $6.50 per U.S. family.

H.R. 2701
The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
Costs $6.48 per family

What People Think

Click here to vote on The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. Click here to vote on The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010.

The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
33% For, 67% Against

Vote on this Bill

Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.

New Items

H.R. 3695
Billy’s Law
Costs $0.41 per family

S. 633
The Tribal Health Promotion and Tribal Colleges and Universities Advancement Act of 2009
Costs $6.15 per family

H.R. 2288
The Endangered Fish Recovery Programs Improvement Act of 2009
Costs $0.10 per family

H.R. 4506
The Bankruptcy Judgeship Act of 2010
Costs $1.05 per family

H.R. 569
The Equal Justice for Our Military Act of 2009
Costs $0.10 per family

S. 1830
The Federal Agency Energy Efficiency Improvement Act of 2009
Costs $0.01 per family

H.R. 2476
The Ski Area Recreational Opportunity Enhancement Act of 2009
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 2924
The Boys & Girls Clubs Centennial Reauthorization Act of 2009
Costs $2.39 per family

S. 1011
The Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act of 2009
Costs $0.08 per family

S. 1453
The Bureau of Reclamation Fish Recovery Programs Reauthorization Act of 2009
Costs $0.22 per family

S. 1757
A bill to provide for the prepayment of a repayment contract between the United States and the Uintah Water Conservancy District, and for other purposes
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 2859
The Coral Reef Conservation Amendments Act of 2009
Costs $1.69 per family

Updated Items

H.R. 2802
To provide for an extension of the legislative authority of the Adams Memorial Foundation to establish a commemorative work in honor of former President John Adams and his legacy, and for other purposes
Costs $0.00 per family

Passed Items

P.L. 111-128
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, as the “John S. Wilder Post Office Building”

P.L. 111-129
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 76 Brookside Avenue in Chester, New York, as the “1st Lieutenant Louis Allen Post Office”

P.L. 111-130
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9810 Halls Ferry Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the “Coach Jodie Bailey Post Office Building”

P.L. 111-131
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 440 South Gulling Street in Portola, California, as the “Army Specialist Jeremiah Paul McCleery Post Office Building”

P.L. 111-132
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 427 Harrison Avenue in Harrison, New Jersey, as the “Patricia D. McGinty-Juhl Post Office Building”

P.L. 111-133
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 16555 Springs Street in White Springs, Florida, as the “Clyde L. Hillhouse Post Office Building”

P.L. 111-134
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 170 North Main Street in Smithfield, Utah, as the “W. Hazen Hillyard Post Office Building”

P.L. 111-135
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3900 Darrow Road in Stow, Ohio, as the “Corporal Joseph A. Tomci Post Office Building”

P.L. 111-136
To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes

P.L. 111-137
To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand veteran eligibility for reimbursement by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for emergency treatment furnished in a non-Department facility, and for other purposes
Costs $0.19 per family

P.L. 111-138
A bill to provide that claims of the United States to certain documents relating to Franklin Delano Roosevelt shall be treated as waived and relinquished in certain circumstances
Costs $0.00 per family

WashingtonWatch.com P.O. Box 77576 Washington, D.C. 20013

(1 comment | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

The President’s Budget—Agency by Agency

HHSThe release of the president’s budget last week kicked off the planning process for fiscal year 2011, which begins October 1st. We reviewed the schedule and the total cost of the budget—$39,000 per family—in a blog post last week.

A lot of statistics come out with the budget, including an agency-by-agency run-down of the president’s proposed spending. So we’ve produced a chart of how much money goes to each agency. Along with the total amount, you can see the amount of spending per family or per person in the chart below.

Some of the numbers are pretty startling. For example, if you look at spending on the Department of Health and Human Services (i.e. Medicare and Medicaid) and Social Security, that’s over $1.5 trillion right there. That’s about $16,000 per U.S. family or $5,100 per person in spending on health and income support. The beautiful—er, uh, boxy—building pictured here is HHS, where a lot of this spending is administered.

Another big chunk of spending is on the military. Put together the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs, and you’ve got about $812 billion in spending—$8,200 per family or $2,600 per person.

It’s up to you as a taxpayer, voter, and citizen to decide whether the federal government’s spending priorities are in the right place. Following the budget and spending process here might give you information you need to tell your member of Congress what you think about it all and ultimately drive the federal government in a direction you prefer.

Agency
Total Spending
Per Family
Per Person
Department of Agriculture
$24.14 billion
$244.81
$78.21
Department of Commerce
$14.242 billion
$144.43
$46.14
Department of Defense
$688.041 billion
$6,977.68
$2,229.29
National Intelligence Program
classified
n/a
n/a
Department of Education
$56.024 billion
$568.16
$181.52
Department of Energy
$28.915 billion
$293.24
$93.69
Department of Health and Human Services
$812.935 billion
$8,244.28
$2,633.95
Department of Homeland Security
$51.602 billion
$523.32
$167.19
Department of Housing and Urban Development
$58.892 billion
$597.25
$190.81
Department of the Interior
$10.907 billion
$110.61
$35.34
Department of Justice
$28.577 billion
$289.81
$92.59
Department of Labor
$172.439 billion
$1,748.77
$558.71
Department of State and Other International Programs
$50.993 billion
$517.14
$165.22
Department of Transportation
$74.581 billion
$756.35
$241.65
Department of the Treasury
$65.041 billion
$659.60
$210.74
Department of Veterans Affairs
$123.982 billion
$1,257.35
$401.71
Corps of Engineers – Civil Works
$7.604 billion
$77.11
$24.64
Environmental Protection Agency
$8.46 billion
$85.80
$27.41
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
$18.333 billion
$185.92
$59.40
National Science Foundation
$6.356 billion
$64.46
$20.59
Small Business Administration
$5.598 billion
$56.77
$18.14
Social Security Administration
$770.379 billion
$7,812.70
$2,496.07
Corporation for National Community Service
$0.762 billion
$7.73
$2.47

(0 comments | Categories: Appropriations/Budget » )

The FY 2011 Budget Process Begins—$39,000 per Family in Spending

On Monday, President Obama sent his budget proposal for the federal government’s 2011 fiscal year to Congress. You can check it out here. The new fiscal year begins October 1st.

If it feels like we just finished a budget cycle, that’s because we just did. Congress and the president finally finished making this year’s spending decisions in mid-December, when it passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, two-and-a-half months into the current fiscal year.

budget_processThe chart shown here highlights the schedule for some key steps in the process for deciding how government funds are spent. As you can see, the first Monday in February is the date on which the president is supposed to submit his budget. This year, President Obama is on time.

But last year he was not. President Obama failed to submit a budget by the first Monday in February. His focus was more on the “stimulus” bill. The president finally limped in with his budget at the beginning of May. And that set the tone for the rest of the budget year. You can read the story of the FY 2010 budget process here.

But what about the numbers?

The budget calls for over $3.8 trillion in spending—just shy of $39,000 per U.S. family, or $12,400 per person. Unfortunately, there isn’t enough revenue to cover all that. The United States will accrue about $1.27 trillion in new debt. That’s almost $12,900 per family, $4,100 per person.

Check this space for reporting on the budget process as it goes on. Perhaps along the way you’ll learn enough about it that you’ll feel inclined to tell your representatives in Congress what you think.

(3 comments | Categories: Appropriations/Budget » )

More Bills on the House Floor This Week

Congress has a light schedule in terms of substantive bills again this week. It will debate the following bills:

S. 2950 – To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal history background checks

H.R. 2843 – Architect of the Capitol Appointment Act of 2009

H.R. 4532 – Social Security Disability Applicants’ Access to Professional Representation Act of 2010

(0 comments | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – February 1, 2010

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of February 1, 2010. Subscribe here.

From the Blog: President Obama Wants Earmark Transparency

In his State of the Union speech last week, President Obama called for the government to publish a database of proposed earmarks like the one WashingtonWatch.com and its team of earmark hunters produced last summer. Read about it in a blog post entitled: “State of the Union: President Obama Wants Earmark Transparency.”

Featured Items

This week the president will introduce his budget for fiscal year 2011. It will call for about $3.8 trillion in spending, about $1.6 trillion of which will be added to the national debt. That’s about $36,600 per U.S. family in spending, $17,350 per family in new debt.

The House will debate H.R. 4061, the Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2009. The bill is intended to advance cybersecurity research, development, and technical standards. Passage of H.R. 4061 would cost a little over $5.50 per U.S. family.

The House will also debate H.J. Res. 45, which would reestablish “Pay-As-You-Go” or “PayGo” rules for Congress. PayGo rules require Congress to pay for new programs by cutting spending in other parts of the budget.

H.J. Res. 45 passed the House once already, as a measure to increase the country’s debt ceiling, but the Senate turned it into a PayGo bill, which the House will now consider.

H.R. 4061
The Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2009
Costs $5.66 per family

H. J. Res. 45
Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt

What People Think

Click here to vote on The Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2009. Click here to vote on The Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2009.

The Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2009
43% For, 57% Against

Vote on this Bill

Click here to vote on H. J. Res. 45. Click here to vote on H. J. Res. 45.

H. J. Res. 45
5% For, 95% Against

Vote on this Bill

Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.

New Items

S. 369
The Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act
Saves $13.56 per family

P.L. 111-126
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions for the relief of victims of the earthquake in Haiti
Saves $0.04 per family

H.R. 1064
The Youth Prison Reduction through Opportunities, Mentoring, Intervention, Support, and Education Act
Costs $16.11 per family

S. 678
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2009
Costs $24.14 per family

S. 714
The National Criminal Justice Commission Act of 2009
Costs $0.14 per family

S. 1140
The La Pine Land Conveyance Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 2869
The Small Business Job Creation and Access to Capital Act of 2009
Costs $0.21 per family

H.R. 1694
The Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Battlefield Protection Act
Costs $0.94 per family

S. 940
The Southern Nevada Higher Education Land Act of 2009
Costs $0.00 per family

Updated Items

none

Passed Items

P.L. 111-126
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions for the relief of victims of the earthquake in Haiti
Saves $0.04 per family

P.L. 111-127
The Emergency Aid to American Survivors of the Haiti Earthquake Act

WashingtonWatch.com P.O. Box 77576 Washington, D.C. 20013

(1 comment | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

State of the Union: President Obama Wants Earmark Transparency

Obama SOTULast summer, our very successful earmarks contest brought together data about the more than 40,000 earmark requests members of Congress and senators sought during the appropriations process. We showed that the public wants a look at earmarks and a say in how taxpayer dollars get spent. Here’s our earmarks map and list.

The White House took notice, and in this Federal Computer Week article, an Office of Management and Budget spokesperson said that they would track earmarks from the request stage during the upcoming FY 2011 budget cycle.

Tonight’s state of the union speech had confirmation that the administration will press forward on transparency. In language that the White House sent me ahead of the speech, President Obama said:

I’m also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform. You have trimmed some of this spending and embraced some meaningful change. But restoring the public trust demands more. For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online. Tonight, I’m calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single website before there’s a vote so that the American people can see how their money is being spent.

It’s great to see focus in an important speech on earmark transparency, and it’s a tribute to the people who made our earmarks contest a success.

Two important clarifications: A web site would be fine, but it’s more important to make the data available to web sites like ours. And if Congress doesn’t do it, the Office of Management and Budget should gather the data as it said it would.

I’m happy to report that a fact sheet put out by the White House says: “It’s time for a comprehensive, bipartisan, state-of-the-art disclosure database that allows Americans to examine the details of every proposed earmark before a vote is taken—one that is fully searchable and otherwise user-friendly.” That’s good. What we want is earmark data.

In the next few weeks, we’ll be providing the White House and the appropriations committees the data schema that we recommend they use in their earmark tracking. Hopefully, this will help them implement the president’s promise, and it will help ensure that the data is the most useful it can be.

In the meantime, congratulations to the WashingtonWatch.com earmark hunters who helped press this genuine change on our government. Thanks are due the president and White House staff for working to follow through on this promise.

Transparency like this is good legislative hygiene, and the example we set here will be picked up elsewhere in the legislative process as we continue to make the government better.

(4 comments | Categories: Appropriations/Budget » )

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – January 25, 2010

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of January 25, 2010. Subscribe here.

From the Blog: Back to the Drawing Board for Health Care Legislation

The surprising election of Republican Scott Brown to succeed Edward Kennedy representing Massachusetts in the U.S. Senate has had huge reverberations. Among other things, it has put the health care plans of President Obama and congressional Democrats into disarray. Read about it in a blog post called “Health Care Legislation: Back to the Drawing Board.”

Featured Items

The president will deliver his first state of the union address this week. Starting at 9 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday night, the speech will be aired on many television networks and streamed live on Whitehouse.gov.

The Senate will continue debate this week on H.J. Res. 45, which would increase the statutory limit on the public debt to over $13 trillion.

Federal law sets the amount of public debt that the U.S. Treasury may issue. As the government’s indebtedness continues to grow, the amount of public debt allowed in federal law has to be revised upwards. Doing so has no costs itself.

Along with a number of other modest bills, the House will debate H.R. 3726, the Castle Nugent National Historic Site Establishment Act of 2009. The bill would establish a historic site at St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands at a cost of about $0.24 per U.S. family.

H. J. Res. 45
Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt

H.R. 3726
The Castle Nugent National Historic Site Establishment Act of 2009
Costs $0.24 per family

What People Think

Click here to vote on H. J. Res. 45. Click here to vote on H. J. Res. 45.

H. J. Res. 45
5% For, 95% Against

Vote on this Bill

Click here to vote on The Castle Nugent National Historic Site Establishment Act of 2009. Click here to vote on The Castle Nugent National Historic Site Establishment Act of 2009.

The Castle Nugent National Historic Site Establishment Act of 2009
36% For, 64% Against

Vote on this Bill

Displayed below are new, updated, and passed items with their cost or savings per family.

New Items

S. 373
A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to include constrictor snakes of the species Python genera as an injurious animal
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 448
The Free Flow of Information Act of 2009
Costs $0.01 per family

S. 555
The Sugar Loaf Fire Protection District Land Exchange Act of 2009
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 721
The Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions and Pratt and Middle Fork Snoqualmie Rivers Protection Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 853
The White Clay Creek Wild and Scenic River Expansion Act of 2009
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 874
The El Rio Grande Del Norte National Conservation Area Establishment Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 2862
The Small Business Export Enhancement and International Trade Act of 2009
Costs $0.63 per family

S. 2856
The International Fisheries Agreement Clarification Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1524
The Foreign Assistance Revitalization and Accountability Act of 2009
Costs $1.77 per family

S. 2727
The START I Treaty Inspections and Monitoring Protocol Continuation Act of 2009
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1139
The Wallowa Forest Service Compound Conveyance Act
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 714
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to lease certain lands in Virgin Islands National Park, and for other purposes
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 1214
The National Fish Habitat Conservation Act
Costs $5.21 per family

S. 1405
The Longfellow House-Washington’s Headquarters National Historic Site Designation Act
Costs $0.00 per family

S. 2865
The Congressional Award Program Reauthorization Act of 2009
Costs $0.01 per family

Updated Items

H.R. 3113
The Upper Elk River Wild and Scenic Study Act
Costs $0.00 per family

H.R. 2711
The FBI Families of Fallen Heroes Act
Costs $0.10 per family

Passed Items

none

WashingtonWatch.com P.O. Box 77576 Washington, D.C. 20013

(0 comments | Categories: The Week Ahead » )

The “Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee”: It’s a Tax

Last week, President Obama unveiled a plan for something he called a ”Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee,” to be fleshed out in his forthcoming budget proposal. (More about his bank regulation plans here. They have not made it into any bill yet.)  He will seek to have some set of financial services providers pay money to the government as comeuppance for the recent financial crisis and government involvement in trying to remedy it.

bankThe naming of the “Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee” is a fairly conspicuous attempt to avoid calling it a tax. But it’s fairly clear that it is.

The galaxy of government revenues has a number of different planets—taxes, fees, penalties, and a few others. If they’re well constructed, fees are generally favored because the recipients of services or benefits pay their costs. Fees avoid redistribution of wealth (either toward or away from payers). But this doesn’t mean that you can name any payment to the government a ”fee” and produce fair and appropriate results.

When I worked on Capitol Hill, I was tasked with writing a bill to deny federal agencies the power to raise taxes, requiring them to be approved by Congress. (You’d think that only Congress should set or raise taxes, right? Sorry to disappoint.) The goal was not to draw fee-setting into the ambit of the bill.

After extensive reasearch into the dividing line between fees and taxes, which is not as simple as one might imagine, I produced the following definition, as found in the Taxpayer’s Defense Act (introduced in the House during the 105th Congress, and the House and Senate in the 106th Congress):

[T]he term “tax” means a non-penal, mandatory payment of money or its equivalent to the extent such payment does not compensate the Federal Government or other payee for a specific benefit conferred directly on the payer.

Parsing it briefly: A penalty is not a tax. A voluntary payment is not a tax. Both payments of money and tranfers of value not denominated in dollars can be taxes. A payment that compensates a benefit conferred is not a tax, but the part of a payment going above the benefit conferred is. A benefit is something the payer wants that is conferred directly on the payer, not benefits conferred on regulated entities generally or on the country as a whole. (And though this isn’t specified in the definition, being regulated isn’t a benefit.)

With even the New York Times referring to President Obama’s “Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee” as a “tax,” there doesn’t seem to be much chance of that the administration will get the “fee” label to stick. But, just in case, here’s confirmation: It’s a tax. Whether it’s a good idea or not is a separate question.

(0 comments | Categories: Financial Services, Taxation » )

Health Care Legislation: Back to the Drawing Board

healthThe election of Republican Scott Brown to succeed Edward Kennedy representing Massachusetts in the U.S. Senate has had huge reverberations. The meaning of it for health care legislation is now starting to become clear.

The provocative, questionable idea that the House and Senate might try to pass a bill before Brown was seated had clearly met its demise when Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) released a statement rejecting that approach.

The next best option for Democratic proponents of the bill was to have the House accept the bill passed by the Senate, doing away with the need for any more Senate votes. (Past posts on the Senate-passed bill are here, here, and here.) That idea appears now to be done for, with reports that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn’t have the votes to do that.

That means that health care essentially goes back to the drawing board.

Whatever you feel about the substance—for or against the bill—it’s a fascinating turn of events. Politicians and political scientists have plenty to learn from it. We should also be sure to focus on finding the best way to improve health care and health outcomes in the country. Sometimes it’s easy to lose track of that in the political machinations.

(8 comments | Categories: Health Care » )