WashingtonWatch.com - Subject: Judicial districts

H.R. 4187, To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an additional judgeship for the western district of Michigan

Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:00:00 EST

H.R. 4187 would amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an additional judgeship for the western district of Michigan....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 4003, To amend title 28, United States Code, to change the composition of the northern and central districts of Illinois

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT

H.R. 4003 would amend title 28, United States Code, to change the composition of the northern and central districts of Illinois....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 3520, The Federal Judgeship and Administrative Efficiency Act of 2007

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EDT

H.R. 3520 would provide for the appointment of additional Federal circuit and district judges, and it would improve the administration of justice....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

S. 1327, A bill to create and extend certain temporary district court judgeships - Cost per Average Family: $0.08

Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EDT

S. 1327 would create and extend certain temporary district court judgeships....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 2487, To provide for an additional place of holding court in the western district of Washington

Thu, 24 May 2007 00:00:00 EDT

H.R. 2487 would provide for an additional place of holding court in the western district of Washington....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 1450, To create 4 new permanent judgeships for the eastern district of California

Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 EST

H.R. 1450 would create 4 new permanent judgeships for the eastern district of California....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 1454, To create 4 new permanent judgeships for the eastern district of California, to provide for an additional place of holding court in the eastern district of California, and for other purposes

Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 EST

H.R. 1454 would create 4 new permanent judgeships for the eastern district of California, and provide for an additional place of holding court in the eastern district of California....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 55, The Judicial District of the Virgin Islands Act of 2007

Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:00:00 EST

H.R. 55 would establish the District Court of the Virgin Islands as a court under article III of the United States Constitution....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 231, To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of Nebraska

Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:00:00 EST

H.R. 231 would authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of Nebraska....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 221, The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judgeship and Reorganization Act of 2007

Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:00:00 EST

H.R. 221 would amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the appointment of additional Federal circuit judges, and divide the Ninth Judicial Circuit of the United States into two circuits....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 4093, The Federal Judgeship and Administrative Efficiency Act of 2005 - Cost per Average Family: $4.66

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:00:00 EST

H.R. 4093 would authorize 93 new permanent and temporary federal judgeships and would extend the authority for specific judgeships in various circuit, district, and bankruptcy courts....

Vote on This Bill: For | Against

H.R. 1751, The Secure Access to Justice and Court Protection Act of 2005 - Cost per Average Family: $3.73

Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 EST

H.R. 1751 would authorize the appropriation of funds over the 2006-2010 period to provide increased court security through the U.S. Marshals Service and to provide grants to states to increase the security of courts and protect witnesses. The bill also would establish mandatory minimum-prison sentences for certain crimes committed against judges and certain public safety officers and their families. Moreover, H.R. 1751 would increase the mandatory minimum-federal sentences for the crimes of murd...

Vote on This Bill: For | Against