Home

Blog

What People Think

36% For, 64% Against

Take Action

Vote on this Bill
For
Against
Speak Out
Comment on this Bill
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 4611, The End Racial Profiling Act of 2007 (6 comments ↓ | 3 wiki edits: view article ↓)

H.R. 4611 would prohibit racial profiling.

(read more ↓)


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Margie

America is not a “melting pot,” where all differences are melted away. America is a good chicken soup with potatoes, carrots, and pieces of chicken (or whatever else happens to be in the soup.) We are all different and that is what is so wonderful about this country.

Kate

The “End Racial Profiling Act” is important in that it not only specifically bans racial profiling, but it allows victims to seek injunctive relief. It also withholds federal funds from state and local governments who persist in this odious practice, and it provides training and other assistance to state and local jurisdictions to help them address the problem head–on.

Kathryn

Racial profiling is everywhere in law enforcement today. One study has shown that about 72% of all routine traffic stops on an interstate in the NE occur with Black drivers despite the fact that Black make up only about 17% of the driving population.

Stop Racial Profiling

Please join this aging Hippie who never liked tie dye, never wore bell bottoms, and never dropped acid, continue to keep America a place where every American can be free to be free.

BTW, my skin is pink and freckled. My heart has no particular color.

Bob

“Racial profiling is a divisive practice that strikes at the very foundation of our democracy." quoted CA congressman, Bob Filner of San Diego, the bill's co-sponsor.

Bounce

Shouldn't we ideally want a law enforcement system that uses and reflects demonstrable trends in criminal acts? If, for example, a certain racial demographic has committed four times as many crimes in a particular area as other demographics, should we really ask police to absolutely ignore that data in the pursuit of their duties? Wouldn't it make more sense to allow racial profiling, but require that, if analysis is used in the pursuit of law enforcement, that resulting activities be statistically congruent with the analytical findings?

Interesting, by the way, that gender and age are not included in the regulatory language, although religion (not a race) is. Why should some types of profiling be more acceptable than others?

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_HR_4611.html

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)