Home

Blog

S. 44, The MCAP Act (3 comments ↓)

S. 44 would improve patient access to health care services and provide improved medical care by reducing the excessive burden the liability system places on the health care delivery system.

(read more ↓)

To What Comittee was this Bill Referred?

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Dennis Hall

February 8, 2013, 5:16pm (report abuse)

Even though this makes perfect sense, what are the chances of this being passed considering that most of Congress seems to be made up of LAWYERS.

Rachel J

March 4, 2013, 11:18pm (report abuse)

While I used to be largely in favor of tort reform, and capping the amount of money a person could win in a medical malpractice suit, I have changed my view on that. I changed my view on this because of the cost to the taxpayers. When the government caps what an individual can win in a medical malpractice suit, and that money runs out, that disabled individual will most likely seek Medicaid to help cover the growing medical bills and future care. The purposed cap in this bill, $250,000, will hardly cover the damages and future medical care an individual will need due to medical malpractice. I feel it is only fair to hold the correct person responsible, the doctors not the taxpayers. The doctors or the medical institution, whichever, is the one that caused the injury, so by rights they should pay for it.

One aspect I really do like of this bill is the more aggressive sanctions for frivolous lawsuits. By doing this, I feel the courts will be less consumed by merit-less suits!

Ashley L

March 5, 2013, 11:33pm (report abuse)

I feel that damages need to be examined on a case by case basis. Setting a standard cap of $250,000 to $500,000 could place families who suffered serious injury that will have lasting results at a serious disadvantage.

I do, however, agree that sanctions should be imposed for frivolous lawsuits and I also agree with setting limits to lawyer compensation because I feel that lawyers at times may partake in merit-less lawsuits strickly out of greed.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)