Home

Blog

S. 1867, The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (6 comments ↓ | 7 wiki edits: view article ↓)

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year.

(read more ↓)
[146 views]

Learn More

    Costs: $6,347.10 per
    and increases their $162,301.27 share of the national debt by $6,347.10.
    (source info)

  • Read the Bill
  • Read an Analysis of the Bill
  • See What People Are Saying

To What Committees was this Bill Referred?

From the Blog

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – November 28, 2011

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of November 28, 2011. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home |log in On the Blog: An Active Inactive Week There are lots of issues that need resolving...

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – December 5, 2011

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of December 5, 2011. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Taking it to the People When Republicans and Democrats can’t a...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Virginia Ann Anderson

November 29, 2011, 1:35pm (report abuse)

Please do not cut this bill as we are more than ever in the need to have strength in the military. They need all the support we can give them. Cut our gifts of billions of dollars to the countries who hate us and we still give them money. Cut them off not our military!

Stefon Nacho

November 30, 2011, 3:14pm (report abuse)

Please support our troops with the proper amount of funding.

ALSO, remove 1031 and 1032 from the bill so that there is not a question as to whether this might be used as a political tool against innocent peoples. Unfetter the hands of the military and allow them to fight. More laws will bind the good men and women of our nation.

SeattleMike

(logged-in user) November 30, 2011, 5:37pm (report abuse)

We spend as much on defence as the rest of the world combined. WHO'S THE ENEMY??

Our casualties aren't caused by a sophisticated enemy, but by a bunch of people who don't value life as we do. We employ thousands of nationals at the various countries where we have bases. That money would be better spent here. Protect our young men and women,and don't send them on dumb missions. And if you do, take care of them upon their return. Why do we need another aircraft carrier? We have more (11) than the rest of the world combined!

Dusty

December 1, 2011, 2:54am (report abuse)

We are being FORCED into a police state by our nonrepresenting representatives and a military used in a dishonorable way is not honor at all.

Support our troops by bringing them home to protect us from the Bankers and technocrats sucking us into a 3rd world status.

Josh Taylor

December 8, 2011, 2:05am (report abuse)

Just more constitutional death to give the military the ability send all Americans to Gitmo. Senator Rand Paul is against this bill.

VOTE NO, Veto it and challenge it to the Supreme Court.

go211mph

December 27, 2011, 12:16am (report abuse)

I sure wish I could withdraw my support from this damn bill. The PEOPLE are NOT being represented...we are paying for our own imprisonment. Arrgh!

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)