Home

Blog

P.L. 112-154, To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for certain requirements for the placement of monuments in Arlington National Cemetery, and for other purposes (3 comments ↓ | 11 wiki edits: view article ↓)

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

H.R. 1627 would amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for certain requirements for the placement of monuments in Arlington National Cemetery.

(read more ↓)
[108 views]

Learn More

    Costs: $0.00 per
    and increases their $162,301.27 share of the national debt by $0.00.
    (source info)

  • Read the Bill
  • Read an Analysis of the Bill
  • See What People Are Saying
  • There was no up-or-down vote in the House.

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.

From the Blog

WashingtonWatch.com – August 13, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of August 13, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: More Petitions! There are lots of petitions awaiting your signature o...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Norman Pickett

October 16, 2012, 5:41pm (report abuse)

H. R. 1627 included a Senate Amendment last minute under Section 109 which denies VA medical care on VA property to anyone protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 with a covered Service Dog. After nearly 12 years of not being discriminated against and getting my medical care at the VA I am in one swift uncontested new law reurned to the old days of discrimination again. Where and how do I get my medical care now?

Norman Pickett

October 16, 2012, 6:43pm (report abuse)

In the far right column was a For vs. Against tab. I clicked on "for" to see who voted for this but instead the counter added me as beiing "for" this bill. There is no way to "UNDUE" a vote so be suspicious of the tabulation of those for and against as it does not actually mean what it says.

Norman Pickett

October 16, 2012, 6:47pm (report abuse)

Most discriminatory Bill passed by Congress this session. The BAD section 109 was added by Senator Patty Murray of Washington State. She is a Democrat but obviously mislead because she was the head of the Veterans Afairs Cmte so why did she disenroll thousands of Veterans? You may also ask The Chair of the House Veterans Affairs Cmte from Florida why he allowed this. He is a Republican.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)