How People Voted
64% For, 36% Against
28 votes cast
Take Action
 |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
 |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Organize | |
|
Start A Petition |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
Discussion: H.R. 525, The Veterinary Public Health Amendments Act of 2011 (1 comment ↓ | 5 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
No discussion on this article yet.
Costs: $ per
and increases their $ share of the national debt by $.
(source: Congressional Budget Office)
Learn More
Visitor Comments
Kristi Rodas
March 8, 2011, 2:16pm (report abuse)I believe it should include a field of study for veterinary technicians, due to the range of need and the ability of veterinary technicians to fulfill the requirements other than the practice of veterinary medicine. We can definately participate in biodefense and emergency preparedness; emerging and reemerging infection diseases; environmental health; ecosystem health pre- and post-harvest food protection; regulatory medicine; diagnostic laboratory medicine; veterinary pathology; biomedical research. Veterinary technicians have the ability to cover these areas, if only there was a specific field of study for a specialty in Public health for veterinary technicians. I have a personal interest in the field but want to remain a licensed veterinary technician rather than a veterinarian.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
From the Blog
WashingtonWatch.com Digest – February 28, 2011
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of February 28, 2011. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: No Government Shutdown This Week Late last week, House Republi...