How People Voted
35% For, 65% Against
39 votes cast
Take Action
 |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
 |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Organize | |
|
Start A Petition |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 4970, The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012 (1 comment ↓ | 5 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
H.R. 4970 would reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act of 1994.
()
[22 views]
Costs: $ per
and increases their $ share of the national debt by $.
(source: Congressional Budget Office)
Learn More
Visitor Comments
Jasmin
June 2, 2012, 9:27pm (report abuse)I am in full support of this bill. I am a child who grew up with domestic violence in my home. I wish my mom would have had access to places like Harbor House which help battered women get on their feet and away from the abuser. I think if she had the resources they do now, some things may have been completely different. I am glad there is funding available to causes such as this one. I also think that we need to encourage no violence to anyone instead of just women, because I know that men can be abused as well.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
From the Blog
Everyone’s Against Violence Against Women
So everyone’s in favor of the Violence Against Women Act, right? A bill to reauthorize the law goes to the House floor this week. The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 was signed by President Bill Clinton. The Act provided $1.6 billion toward in...WashingtonWatch.com Digest – May 14, 2012
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of May 14, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: The Violence Against Women Act The Senate has already passed a bill, and...