Home

Blog

Discussion: H.R. 358, The Protect Life Act (4 comments ↓ | 11 wiki edits: view article ↓)

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

No discussion on this article yet.

Learn More

    Costs: $0.00 per
    and increases their $162,301.27 share of the national debt by $0.00.
    (source info)

  • Read the Bill
  • Read an Analysis of the Bill
  • See What People Are Saying

Who Sponsored and Cosponsored This Bill?


(show list ↓)

From the Blog

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – March 7, 2011

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of March 7, 2011. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Getting Out of the Mortgage Business Last week, the House made its...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Jerry Peters

February 5, 2011, 5:27am (report abuse)

The Protect life Act, H.R. 358 would address flaws in the new health care reform law and bring it into line with policies on abortion and conscience rights that have long prevailed in other federal health programs.It would do so by preventing funds under the new law from subsidizing abortion or healthcare plans that cover abortion, protecting the consciences of health care providers who decline to participte in an abortion, and ensuring that the law doesn't overide state laws on abortion and conscience

Traveling Trish

October 14, 2011, 6:10am (report abuse)

Anyone who voted for this bill is voting to murder women. PERIOD.

pdizzle

October 14, 2011, 12:14pm (report abuse)

This law permits insurers to deny women life-saving procedures. It allows doctors to let their patients die. Cathy McMorris-Rodgers is gung-ho about it because she is secretly a patriarchal cyborg.

willyum

(logged-in user) November 3, 2012, 9:13pm (report abuse)

The "type" of people who promote legislation like this, while claiming to be "protecting life", are frequently the same "types" who support massive spending on "defense" and war. They oppose abortion, out of an unspoken desire to have a ready supply of "cannon fodder" for their next war. (Cynical, yes - but probably true.)

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)