Home

Blog

H.R. 2146, The DATA Act (9 comments ↓ | 5 wiki edits: view article ↓)

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

H.R. 2146 would amend title 31, United States Code, to require accountability and transparency in Federal spending.

(read more ↓)
[110 views]

Learn More

    Costs: $5.55 per
    and increases their $162,301.27 share of the national debt by $5.55.
    (source info)

  • Read the Bill
  • Read an Analysis of the Bill
  • See What People Are Saying

From the Blog

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – September 26, 2011

This is the WashingtonWatch.com newsletter for the week of September 26, 2011. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Stopgap Spending With just days to go before the new fiscal year, and without a ...

Data Transparency Coalition Debuts Today

Meet the Data Transparency Coalition. The Washington Post‘s Capitol Business blog reports this morning: A small but growing collection of companies has formed a coalition that will push the federal government to establish a standard system by whi...

The GSA Scandal: How to Fix It, How Not to Fix It

Congress is tripping over itself to respond to the scandalous spending of over $800,000 on a General Services Administration conference in Las Vegas. The GSA is an obscure $30 billion agency that provides for common needs of other agencies, things like...

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – April 23, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of April 23, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: The GSA Scandal Congress is trying to figure out what to do about the ...

We Support the DATA Act

Here’s a letter that we signed onto in support of H.R. 2146, the DATA Act. Some key lines: The DATA Act is an important step towards improving federal financial transparency and would empower the public to better understand how their federal doll...

DATA Act on House Floor Today

The DATA Act (H.R. 2146) gets a vote on the House floor today. The folks at the Data Transparency Coalition have put together a video to illustrate the problem, and this particular solution. We wrote more about the DATA Act in a post entitled: “T...

Your Chance to Advance Government Transparency

Look on this list—do you see your state? If so, here’s your chance to advance government transparency. Connecticut, Maine, Michigan, Oklahoma, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Delaware, Arizona, Arkansas, Wisconsin, Louisiana, Ohio, Missouri, Kentuck...

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – April 30, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of April 30, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Transparency: Go! If your state is listed below, you can help improve ...

‘Tis the Season … Grant Season

It’s a very special time of year in one area of governing you don’t hear about much. It’s the end of the fiscal year. What’s so special about the end of the fiscal year? It’s when the grant programs in the federal governme...

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – October 1, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of October 1, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Transparency Grades Nobody’s grades are very good, but where Co...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

WW2 Veteran

April 23, 2012, 11:09am (report abuse)

The Fox watching the Chicken House. "The only way" is to add another Goverment entity.

We have more than enough checks and balances but these departments look the other way and our elected officials are too weak kneed to do anything about the ever on going Government waste WHICH IS NOT NEW. And We the People are too busy to speak out against the spend

thrift Government. "All that is necessary is for good people go do nothing". But the illegals

speak loud and clear... "GIMMIE", its my right. I vote no. These are other controls but few in

Goverment have heard about honesty.

Matt

April 23, 2012, 8:03pm (report abuse)

Another government agency to check the checker?

IMHO given how sloppy, arrogant and they have no shame attitude, this has been going on for not only the Obama administration but many before him. The goes with the CIA mess in South America.

Ashley

April 30, 2012, 10:11am (report abuse)

Sound of thing that sounds very good in theory but in practice would be ineffectual at best and in the process would add another layer of bureaucracy and waste taxpayer funds.

Matt Matherne

April 30, 2012, 3:02pm (report abuse)

Laws are not fool proof. Some devious political insider/lawyer most likely will find a way to circumvent the law.

Virginia Anderson

April 30, 2012, 4:17pm (report abuse)

It is about time someone will be accountable for my hard earned money they spend so freely! In the business world I would expect this. There needs to be higher standards for elected officials.

Becky S

May 1, 2012, 1:18pm (report abuse)

Ashley, one could argue that taxpayer funds are already being wasted by maintaining multiple online sources of federal spending data, none of which is complete or fully accurate.

I welcome a consolidation into a single site that reports spending from the perspective of the Treasury, funding recipients, and agencies. One stop shopping and easier to find the discrepancies & errors.

greg_not_so

May 18, 2012, 7:05am (report abuse)

why is there a new agency required? it should be part of existing one like SEC or Department of Treasury. it's a good idea having an opportunity to become a bad one once implemented.

William Marshal

May 21, 2012, 2:30pm (report abuse)

The real value of the data act is in the standarization of reporting practices and the use of a common standard for financial reporting like that used in the eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL). The benefits of XBRL are highly touted by the accounting community. The challenge is that in order for the benefits of standard XBRL usage and definitions to be realized they need to be legislated. Because of that I support the DATA act.

kat2005

October 3, 2012, 10:21pm (report abuse)

EXECUTIVE ORDERS ISSUED…

Teddy Roosevelt 3

Others to FDR NONE

FDR 11 in 16 years

Truman 5 in 7 years

Ike 2 in 8 years

Kennedy 4 in 3 years

LBJ 4 in 5 years

Nixon 1 in 6 years

Ford 3 in 2 years

Carter 3 in 4 years

Reagan 5 in 8 years

Bush 3 in 4 years

Clinton 15 in 8 years

George W. Bush 62 in 8 years

Obama 923 in 3 1/2 years!

If you don't get the implications you're not paying attention. How many warnings do you need?

Scary !

923 Executive Orders in 40 Months

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT 923 EX. ORDERS IN ONE PART OF ONE TERM ???

?????? YES, THERE IS A REASON.

IT IS THAT THE PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED TO TAKE CONTROL AWAY FROM THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)