Home

Blog

Subjects

Budget Categories

Recent Blog Posts

How People Voted

56% For, 44% Against
37 votes cast

(put this on your site)

H. J. Res. 2, Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States (2 comments ↓ | 6 wiki edits: view article ↓)

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

(read more ↓)


Learn More

See Who Sponsored and Cosponsored This Bill

(show all↓)

See Related Bills:

See Bills on the Same Subject:
N/A

See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
N/A

From the Blog

Congress’ First Week: Let’s Amend the Constitution!

With the start of the new Congress last week, a passel of constitutional amendments were introduced. Putting them forward on the first day signals that this time there’s really going to be an effort behind it! Or maybe it’s just putting on...

A Balanced Budget Amendment Without a Budget?

Is a balanced budget amendment something Congress should get to pass without first passing a budget for the ongoing fiscal year? It seems like the BBA should wait until there’s a budget, kinda like dessert waits until you’ve finished your v...

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – November 14, 2011

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of November 14, 2011. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: A Budget Amendment, But No Budget Congress plans to take up a balan...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

***

January 30, 2011, 12:10am (report abuse)

An important part of this should include Rep. Michele Bachmann's proposal to control and reduce veteran program costs.

Ralph Kolb

April 18, 2011, 10:30am (report abuse)

Anyone who is serious about balancing the budget must look at the Veterans Administration. This year the VA is paying out a huge amount of money to a small group of veterans. A large number of these payments are reaching and exceeding half a million ($500,000) dollars per person. All of this is the result of a bad decision made last year by Secretary Shinseki to include certain heart problems in the Agent Orange presumptive disease list.

It is important to remember that the people receiving these benefits are mostly male and in their 60's. Heart disease is rampant among this group in the general population, due mostly to lifestyle. And yet Shinseki decided they should be covered under the presumptives.

This kind of action by irresponsible politicians like Shinseki is causing the budget to grow out of control every day.

Congress should repeal the Agent Orange Act and stop throwing money down the drain for these kinds of things.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)