S. 238 would provide $50,000,000,000 in new transportation infrastructure funding through bonding to empower States and local governments to complete significant infrastructure projects across all modes of transportation, including roads, bridges, rail and transit systems, ports, and inland waterways.
Detailed Summary
Build America Bonds Act of 2009 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow an income tax credit for any Build America bond issued by the Transportation Finance Corporation as part of an issue, if 100% of the available project proceeds from such issue are to be used for expenditures incurred for one or more qualified projects. Requires proceeds from the sale of bonds issued under this Act to be held in a Build America Bonds Trust Account.
Defines "qualified project" as the capital improvements to any transportation infrastructure project (including roads, bridges, rail and transit systems, ports, and inland waterways) proposed by one or more states and approved by the Transportation Finance Corporation.
Grants Congress' consent and recognition to the establishment by two or more state infrastructure banks of the Transportation Finance Corporation. Authorizes the Transportation Finance Corporation to: (1) issue Build America bonds for the financing of qualified projects; (2) establish and operate the Build America Bonds Trust Account; (3) leverage resources and stimulate public and private investment in transportation infrastructure; and (4) perform any other function the sole purpose of which is to carry out the financing of qualified projects through Build America bonds.
Amends the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 to extend certain customs fees for the processing of merchandise entered into the United States through specified dates in 2046.
Status of the Legislation
Latest Major Action: 1/14/2009: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Points in Favor
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
Points Against
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
Visitor Comments
Rural America
February 20, 2009, 6:22pm (report abuse)This is a great idea if an individual can get these. But I figure that the only people that will be able to afford these "small amount" bonds will need to pony up 20-200K. I think it would be better if they issued some of the bonds in the $100 to $5000 range so that people would feel that they are investing in their future.
Remember "War Bonds"?
CRT
April 28, 2009, 1:22pm (report abuse)We certainly need to do something to repair our infrastructure but I'm not sure more debt is the answer.
Minimum initial investment
April 30, 2009, 6:20pm (report abuse)You can buy into the bonds with at least $5,000, not $20k.
Outside US
May 21, 2009, 3:12pm (report abuse)These available to non-US residents?
James in VA
June 19, 2009, 10:27pm (report abuse)I'll keep this short as I feel my head will explode if I hear much more of the bs DC is doing.
WE GIVE 100's of BILLIONS to bankers which we PAY interest on to the SAME BANKERS!!!! What is going on????? So far according to Bloomberg the bankers have STOLE around 16-17 TRILLION DOLLARS from US the taxpayers. How many roads could be built for that??? I would say ALL OF THEM. END THE FED!!! Then fix everything with dept free money issued by our government, not private bankers who leech off us. Support HR 1207 and S 604 Audit the fed.
Lori in NYC
July 6, 2009, 8:32am (report abuse)If I understand this correctly, this is a terrific idea. Many munis end up getting refunded for savings after the 10 year call. If this BABs bonds are sold in the traditional corporate structure, without the call options, investment banks will stop making money off of muni issuers by "recycling" their debt structure every 10 years.
Also, it means that everyday people, not in the 35% tax bracket, could actually purchase these high quality credit muni bonds.
Chuck in Houston
July 6, 2009, 2:01pm (report abuse)Can anyone point me to info addressing the following worst-case scenario: assume the municipality defaults on one of its BAB coupon payments -- what happens to the 35% subsidy from the U.S. Treasury? I have heard people representing the Treasury say that, as far as the subsidy payments not needing subsequent appropriation by Congress, that such payments would be considered as "tax refunds". Does this mean that bondholders, in my worst-case scenario, would not receive any of such payments?
Pete
(logged in user) July 11, 2009, 9:30am (report abuse)where can you buy these BAB's ?