What People Think
55% For, 45% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
![]() ![]() |
For |
![]() ![]() |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
![]() ![]() |
Comment on this Bill |
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
S. 1536, The ALERT Drivers Act (3 comments ↓)
S. 1536 would amend title 23, United States Code, to reduce the amount of Federal highway funding available to States that do not enact a law prohibiting an individual from writing, sending, or reading text messages while operating a motor vehicle.
()
[46 views]
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)










Visitor Comments
Bob Thompson
August 4, 2009, 1:26pm (report abuse)Why must we have a law to prohibit every conceivable situation? In Texas we already have a law to "failure to maintain control". Doesn't matter is you're eating a burger, slurping a soda or scratching your arse. Why laws to pertain to certain actions? I guess our Representatives have to justify the time spent in Washington.
Dan Perlman
September 19, 2009, 8:32am (report abuse)If this were simply a mandate to states to prohibit texting in these situations, I'd object to the federal govt's attempt to insert itself into yet one more part of our lives, but given that it's specifically tied to federal funding of highways, I actually have no problem with this. Putting conditions on the distribution of funds is perfectly acceptable, and states that don't wish to comply with the conditions can simply choose not to and lose funding.
klsim
September 19, 2009, 9:39am (report abuse)it's outright extortion by the fed and usurping of state legislatures explicit powers.