How People Voted
13% For, 87% Against
46 votes cast
Take Action
![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Organize | |
![]() |
Start A Petition |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
Discussion: S. 1005, The Water Infrastructure Financing Act (2 comments ↓ | 5 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 111th Congress (2009-2010) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
No discussion on this article yet.
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)


Visitor Comments
John Rumpler
May 13, 2009, 6:57pm (report abuse)We applaud Senator Cardin and the EPW Committee for taking up the urgent issue of repairing and enhancing our water infrastructure, so that our rivers, lakes, and beaches - as well as our drinking water - can be clean and safe for all Americans. In addition, we urge the Senate to consider the precedent it set in passing the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act - which set aside 20 percent of water state revolving funds for green infrastructure and water efficiency projects. Green infrastructure prevents sewage and runoff pollution at the source in a cost-effective and environmentally sound manner. Similarly, saving water through enhanced efficiency is both economical and healthiest for our rivers and streams.
John Rumpler
May 13, 2009, 7:01pm (report abuse)regarding my submitted comment, please add my affiliation:
John Rumpler is Senior Attorney for Environment America.