How People Voted
36% For, 64% Against
50 votes cast
Take Action
 |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
 |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Organize | |
|
Start A Petition |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
Discussion: P.L. 111-274, The Plain Language Act of 2009 (9 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 111th Congress (2009-2010) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
No discussion on this article yet.
Cost per :
Learn More
There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.
Visitor Comments
There are currently no comments for this bill
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
From the Blog
WashingtonWatch.com Digest – March 15, 2010
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of March 15, 2010. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in From the Blog: Just Give Us the Earmark Data! WashingtonWatch.com has launche...WashingtonWatch.com Digest – October 18, 2010
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of October 18, 2010. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Earmark Politics and Earmark Transparency We’ve been doin...Plain Language Regulation?
Now where have we seen this before? S. 2337 would require that federal regulations use plain writing that is clear, concise, well-organized, and appropriate for the subject matter and intended audience. Well, according to the “Plain Writing Assoc...