How People Voted
19% For, 81% Against
21 votes cast
Take Action
![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Organize | |
![]() |
Start A Petition |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 63, To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require hospitals reimbursed under the Medicare system to establish and implement security procedures to reduce the likelihood of infant patient abduction and baby switching, including procedures for identifying all infant patients in the hospital in a manner that ensures that it will be evident if infants are missing from the hospital (1 comment ↓ | 3 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 111th Congress (2009-2010) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
- This bill, or a similar bill, was reintroduced in the current Congress as H.R. 82, The Infant Protection and Baby Switching Prevention Act of 2013.
H.R. 63 would amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require hospitals reimbursed under the Medicare system to establish and implement security procedures to reduce the likelihood of infant patient abduction and baby switching, including procedures for identifying all infant patients in the hospital in a manner that ensures that it will be evident if infants are missing from the hospital.
()
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)


Visitor Comments
Corey
(logged-in user) June 7, 2009, 4:06am (report abuse)Could a hospital conceivably use implanted micro chips to meet the obligation of making a child identifyable even is taken from the hospital? A little scary to think that all Federally Reimbursed hospitals will be required to provide 'evident' identification of baby's.