Home

Blog

What People Think

51% For, 49% Against

Take Action

Vote on this Bill
For
Against
Speak Out
Comment on this Bill
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 3246, The Advanced Vehicle Technology Act of 2009 (8 comments ↓ | 11 wiki edits: view article ↓)

H.R. 3246 would provide for a program of research, development, demonstration and commercial application in vehicle technologies at the Department of Energy.

(read more ↓)
[89 views]


Cost per :

From the Blog

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – September 8, 2009

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of September 8, 2009. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in Earmark Collecting Done! Our earmarks contest has collected over 41,000 ear...

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – September 14, 2009

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of September 14, 2009. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in From the Blog: The Catfish Genome The earmark data collected on Washington...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

I'm confused

September 14, 2009, 10:59am (report abuse)

Since the greatest effort to produce comes from self interested private companies I'm confused as to why we are paying for R & D when the standard should be set and those companies should strive to meet it. Or just borrow the technology from other countries that are ahead of us. Will we next be paying to convert factories for these same self interested producers?

SHO

September 14, 2009, 11:33am (report abuse)

I would certainly rather see money spent this way, in an effort to produce something, instead of paying more unemployment to those who are not producing anything, except perhaps a lot of hot gas.

CDB

September 14, 2009, 3:30pm (report abuse)

Sounds like a good place to invest some money. Better that than more welfare handouts.

John E Adam

September 15, 2009, 3:25pm (report abuse)

Vehicles are between 3 and 4 times more energy efficient using electric motors than with ICE engines. ICE can be used to charge batteries and extend the range of electric vehicles using the same techniques as diesel electric locomotives have used for over half a century.
While current battery technology will only allow short trips, thirty or forty miles, between charging, this is more than sufficient for the majority of our daily commutes and shopping. Using an ICE to charge batteries and replacing its heavy energy wasting transmission will still allow an electric motor powered vehicle to travel significantly further on the same amount of petroleum even after its battery charge from our electric grid has been significantly depleted.
The development of an electric SMART GRID will allow our current electric utility systems to charge millions of electric vehicle batteries using electricity now being wasted during periods where power generation significantly exceeds customer demands.

CJI

September 15, 2009, 5:07pm (report abuse)

Sounds like communism.

James Swidergal

September 15, 2009, 7:04pm (report abuse)

I don't like being unemployed for the past five years, and I don't recieve squat from unemployment and/or welfare,(being white, male,single,and homeless and over 50) but more has to be done just to keep us off the street, I'm for this bill if only I can get paid for contributing ideas on how we should go when the R&D bucks start to flow.

MC

September 16, 2009, 12:53am (report abuse)

Creating economies of scale in an industry should be put on the shoulders of those who can afford it. Give tax credits to the purchasers of advanced vehicles. Rather than a tax increase to pay for this mandate we give those who can afford the higher, upfront, cost of the vehicles, an incentive for participating in our program by giving them back money they otherwise would have paid in taxes. This would provide incentive for those companies currently in the market to increase production of current technologies. This would cause other, smaller companies, startups, etc. to enter the market in order to get access to the new dollars. This would force current manufacturers to crank up their R&D departments in order to compete with the new ideas being produced by the new market entrants. Ten years=economies of scale=average families could afford the cars. This approach has the further benefit of not utilizing "filtered" dollars making the program have a much cheaper real dollar price tag.

from California

September 17, 2009, 1:33pm (report abuse)

Another unConstitutional intrusion into our lives by this out of control Congress. Seems like they all just sit around and dream up ways to spend more money we dont' have in areas that the Fed govt has no business sticking it's nose in. Time to clean house! The House.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)