H.R. 3126, The Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 (24 comments ↓ | 5 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 111th Congress (2009-2010) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
H.R. 3126 would establish the Consumer Financial Protection Agency.
()
Cost per :
Learn More
Visitor Comments

rlittle
(logged-in user) July 9, 2009, 6:15pm (report abuse)Under this law, every bank would be required to offer federally approved and required “standard financial products and services.” This means that every bank would offer precisely the same group of deposits and loans. Deviations from this would be watched so closely, and subject to such severe penalties that only the federally approved financial services and products will, as a practical matter, be offered. This is a breathtaking grab of control of ordinary community banks in small towns across America.
There’s more.
Jordan Fogal
July 10, 2009, 1:30pm (report abuse)Bigger is not better in the case of banking institutions. Does no one remember Standard oil? The last three privately owned banks we loved and used were bought out by Wells Fargo. WF is horrible at customer service and changed many things to consumers detriment after the hearings. Morgan Stanley has 900 dollars of my mother in laws, they have heldsince her death over 3 years ago. They say they never recieved the docments, when we had certified mail reciepts. For a year they promised we would recieve the money in two weeks. Checks in the mail... We wanted to pay for her head stone. These instituions do not care and we are at their mercy. Also, these instituions hide behind forced arbitration clauses, if there is a dispute. Consumers have no confidence because they have been assaulted from all sides.
lalexander
August 5, 2009, 12:47pm (report abuse)This legislation is crazy. Banks are already heavily regulated. Community banks and credit unions did not cause the financial crisis but they will pay for it. This bill would require new FTC enforcement against banks. Americans should oppose this measure because the federal government should not be in the business of dictating the details of what any business does. The federal government would be able to “define” the “terms, conditions and features” of the various products and services of banks across America. This could include how long a mortgage or deposit could be (30 years, 15 years, or whatever the government says) the rate charged on these products, etc.
MORE BIG GOVERNMENT--JUST SAY NO!
E. Buchanan
August 9, 2009, 10:45pm (report abuse)Very much against this bill. Government does not need to be involved in the banking or lending business.
Richard Conner
August 20, 2009, 1:52pm (report abuse)As Robert Reich so aptly states in his book, "Supercapitalism", Corporations/business do not have to be moral and ethical. They are in the business to make a profit, and as much as they want to get what they want. Someone has to protect the consumer from abuse. That is why we must have a Consumer Protection Agency.
sadie
August 25, 2009, 10:22pm (report abuse)Hey Richard Conner - I am all about having consumer protection, but you need to read this bill. It says that the govt can dictate what products banks offer to consumers (YOU) and how they are mareketed. Banks would be required to offer products that the govt deems more appropriate for you than the banks do...although banks primary business is to offer what would fit their customers. Do you really want the govt to decide what checking account is best for you? READ THE BILL!!!! Of course banks are for-profit companies (capitalism), but that doesn't mean that the govt is more qualified to tell you what best fits your needs. You can choose whatever bank product you want now. This bill wants to force you to look at govt options and reject them before the banks even get to offer you anything that they have deemed a possible fit due to years of research and millions of dollars to figure out. Think about it....pretty simple!
John Lucas
October 22, 2009, 3:14pm (report abuse)A great piece of legislation that was need years ago.
maryanne
October 25, 2009, 3:57pm (report abuse)yes, and I'm finding out that Maxine Waters added a provision to have ACORN as a member of the board. They are running amok in Washington and the country be damed. It passed 33-35.
MIKE KIRBY
October 29, 2009, 8:15pm (report abuse)THE JOB OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS NOT TO RUN BANKS, FINANCE COMPANIES, SELL CARS, SELL INSURANCE ,OR FOR THAT MATTER SELL ANYTHING. OUR GOVERNMENT CAN'T EVEN RUN THEMSELVES. INSTEAD OF WORRYING ABOUT THIS, YOU NEED TO STOP KILLING UNBORN BABIES! FIND A WAY TO STOP THE DRUG PROBLEM. FIND A WAY TO LOWER CRIME.FIND JOBS NOT TAKE AWAY JOBS! NO MATTER IF YOU ARE A DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT YOUR JOB IS TO BE FAIR TO ALL AMERICANS. THIS BILL IS PLAIN OUT RIDICULOUS!
Ryan Hammond
October 30, 2009, 10:35am (report abuse)H.R. 3126 would create a new regulator appointed by President Obama. It would have the power to strip from consumers their freedom of choice and restrict their credit opportunities in the midst of a financial recession -- all in the name of "consumer protection." For example, agency bureaucrats could tell our customers how many loans they may take and how they will borrow money. They will also have the authority to assess fees on lenders to pay for the cost of the new agency, thus increasing the cost to the consumer. Rules that regulate an already working industry to “streamline” the regulatory system are unnecessary. Finally, this agency will give the government control over compensation standards for employees of financial services institutions and could eliminate arbitration clauses.
WHAT IF YOU NEED A LOAN
October 30, 2009, 10:58am (report abuse)The installment loan industry serves people who are trying to meet both day-to-day and unexpected expenses. Most customers are employed, but like many Americans, have little savings. Many have damaged credit histories, which further inhibits access to credit even in the best economy. Because commercial banks rarely offer small dollar (under $2,000) loans to their existing depositors—much less to non-depositors—the options for the installment loan customer are few.
WHAT IF YOU NEED A LOAN
October 30, 2009, 11:00am (report abuse)Establishing a Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) will give bureaucrats in Washington power far beyond regulating mortgages and real estate. The CFPA may regulate consumers’ credit cards, debit cards, consumer loans, installment loans, payday loans, credit reporting agencies, debt collection, stored-value cards and even investment advisory and financial advisory services, to name only a few.
WHAT IF YOU NEED A LOAN
October 30, 2009, 11:02am (report abuse)Handing over consumer protection and enforcement powers to a new agency that does not understand the business side of banking will be burdensome for lenders and add extra layers of bureaucracy and nightmarish legal liabilities.The creation of a new federal agency, in addition to the state agencies they currently comply with, will restrict what installment lenders can charge for their services and could well force them out of business altogether.
John Adams
November 3, 2009, 5:06am (report abuse)I find so much going on in Washington, today, confusing. It is unimaginable to me to see my countrymen willingly, like lemmings, give up their freedoms. Some small regulations are quite different from what HR3126 would allow. It, also, appears that this bill is, yet, another step in the process of passing that most foul bill: "Cap and Trade". If this character, Frank, is for something, hold on to your wallet!
Carlene Foster
November 4, 2009, 2:36pm (report abuse)I think this is another Obama mad goverment intrusion into our rights & you better write your congressman NOW! IF they do not listen, it is another reason to vote them ALL OUT at the next election! I am sick of all this aren't YOU??
JUNE S MORROW
November 9, 2009, 10:29am (report abuse)This new "Law" is unneccessary...there are more important things to be regulated than this.....We "the people" should make this type of decesion as far as who and how we want to do business...The government is already struggling...this new law could put several more people out of a job!!!! It does not make sense AT ALL....
Robert Jenkins
December 7, 2009, 2:06pm (report abuse)All I know is that Advanta Bank increased my small business credit card account interest from 9% to 36% in January of this year (and I've never been a day late on a payment) because they somehow could.
This translates to $2430./year additional interest than I was paying before. These greedy bastards must be regulated and our government is the entity to do such regulation and to enforce it!
Pat W
February 3, 2010, 3:23pm (report abuse)A very essential and appropriate function of the government is to protect the individual consumer from being taken advantage of by large banks and corporations. This bill is good for the people.
KevinM
February 8, 2010, 11:57pm (report abuse)The community banking association has come out in favor of this bill. They must not see it as a huge burden. The "big Six" of course are against it. They dont like regulation or being held accountable.
J
April 15, 2010, 10:08am (report abuse)Well unfortunately as I was always told in high elementary school.."one bad apple spoils they whole bunch!" big government is what happens as a result of criminals abusing the system...american's 8 years of abuse under the Bush administration have given us Obama and now the financial crisis is causing another problem...if you don't want big government don't abuse the system; because after ever crisis including the great depression....drastic changes will come and who will be in the details? THE GOVERNMENT!!! it has always been that way; always will be; so until something changes big government is all you will see for more generations to come
J
April 15, 2010, 10:10am (report abuse)Well unfortunately as I was always told in elementary school.."one bad apple spoils the whole bunch!" big government is what happens as a result of criminals abusing the system...American's 8 years of abuse under the Bush administration have given us Obama and now the financial crisis is causing another problem...if you don't want big government don't abuse the system; because after ever crisis including the great depression....drastic changes will come and who will be in the details? THE GOVERNMENT!!! it has always been that way; always will be; so until something changes big government is all you will see for more generations to come WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT..and I don't but it is what it is.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)


From the Blog
WashingtonWatch.com Digest – December 14, 2009
email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in From the Blog: Consolidated Spending Bill—$9,500 per U.S. Family The 2010 fiscal year began back in October, but until last night Congress had passed only five of the twelve b....