H.R. 2187 would direct the Secretary of Education to make grants to State educational agencies for the modernization, renovation, or repair of public school facilities.
Detailed Summary
21st Century Green High-Performing Public School Facilities Act - <b>Title I: Grants for Modernization, Renovation, or Repair of Public School Facilities</b> <b>-</b> (Sec. 102) Requires the Secretary of Education to make grants to states for the modernization, renovation, or repair of public schools, including early learning facilities and charter schools, to make them safe, healthy, high-performing, and technologically up-to-date.
Allocates grant funds among states on the basis of the relative portion of school improvement funds provided to local educational agencies (LEAs) in each state under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.
Reserves 2% of the grant funds for assistance to outlying areas and Indian schools.
Reserves 5% of the grant funds for LEAs serving geographic areas with significant economic distress and those serving geographic areas recovering from a natural disaster.
Requires states to reallocate such grant funds to LEAs on the basis of each LEA's share of school improvement funds received by LEAs in the state for the previous fiscal year.
(Sec. 104) Allows LEAs to give priority to projects involving the abatement, removal, or interim control of asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, mold, mildew, lead-based hazards, or a proven carcinogen.
<b>Title II: Supplemental Grants for Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama -</b> (Sec. 202) Requires the Secretary to make grants to LEAs in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama for the construction, modernization, renovation, or repair of public schools, including early learning facilities and charter schools, to make them safe, healthy, high-performing, and technologically up-to-date.
Allocates grant funds among such LEAs on the basis of each LEA's share of infrastructure damage inflicted on public school facilities in such states by Hurricane Katrina or Hurricane Rita in 2005.
<b>Title III: General Provisions - </b>(Sec. 301) Prohibits LEAs from using this Act's grants: (1) for maintenance costs; (2) for facilities used primarily for events for which the public is charged admission or for which the purpose is not the education of children; (3) to supplant funds otherwise available for school modernization, renovation, repair, and construction efforts; or (4) to purchase carbon offsets.
(Sec. 303) Prohibits States from considering LEAs' receipt of this Act's grants in determining their eligibility for state aid or the amount of state aid they receive.
(Sec. 304) Conditions LEA grant eligibility on LEA and state spending for free public education remaining above specified levels. Requires states to reduce the amount of grant funds available to an LEA by the proportion by which the LEA's spending falls below such levels. Directs the Secretary to waive such maintenance of effort requirements if such waiver is justified by exceptional or uncontrollable circumstances, or the precipitous decline in an LEA's financial resources.
(Sec. 305) Requires grantees' contracting procedures for school modernization, renovation, repair, and construction to ensure the maximum number of qualified bidders through full and open competition.
(Sec. 306) Requires the iron and steel used in projects funded under this Act to have been produced in this country, subject to specified exceptions.
(Sec. 307) Requires all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors in the performance of work assisted under this Act to be paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing on similar work in the locality.
(Sec. 309) Directs LEA grantees to use a percentage of their grant, rising in 10% increments from 50% in FY2010 to 100% in FY2015, for public school modernization, renovation, repairs, or construction that meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building rating standards, Energy Star standards, Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS) criteria, Green Building Initiative environmental design and rating standards (Green Globes), or equivalent standards adopted by the entities that have jurisdiction over such LEAs.
Requires the Secretary to provide outreach and technical assistance to states and LEAs concerning the best practices in school modernization, renovation, repair, and construction.
(Sec. 310) Directs: (1) LEAs to report annually to their states, and the public, on their use of such grant funds; (2) states to submit annually to the Secretary a compilation of the information received from their LEAs; and (3) the Secretary to report to Congress annually on grants made under this Act.
(Sec. 311) Authorizes appropriations for this Act's grant programs for FY2010-FY2015.
Prohibits the use of such funds for Congressional earmarks.
(Sec. 312) Prohibits the use of this Act's grants: (1) to employ workers who are illegal aliens or whose status has not been ascertained using the employment verification system; or (2) by LEAs that do not require a criminal background check on all their employees.
(Sec. 313) Requires the Secretary to work with grant recipients to promote appropriate opportunities for participants in a YouthBuild program to gain employment experience on projects funded under this Act. (YouthBuild programs provide education and employment skills to disadvantaged youth.)
(Sec. 314) Requires the Department of Education to evaluate the effect this Act's projects have on student academic achievement and to report its findings to Congress.
(Sec. 315) Directs the Secretary to establish an Advisory Council on Green, High-Performing Schools to provide the Secretary with advice on the academic, health, energy, and environmental impact of such schools and assistance in facilitating their creation.
(Sec. 316) Requires the Secretary to work with grant recipients to promote appropriate opportunities for individuals enrolled in the Job Corps program or a community or junior college to gain employment experience on projects funded under this Act.
(Sec. 318) Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on the extent and type of green, high-performing school projects being undertaken at schools around the country, the geographic distribution of green, high-performing schools, and their availability to disadvantaged, disabled, or limited English proficient students and students from major racial and ethnic groups.
(Sec. 319) Allows LEAs to encourage schools at which this Act's projects are being implemented to educate students about the project and its benefits.
Status of the Legislation
Latest Major Action: 5/18/2009: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Points in Favor
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
Points Against
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
Visitor Comments
WildPeach
(logged-in user) May 12, 2009, 10:17am (report abuse)As a parent of a child whose school could definitely use such funds, it is hard for me to see why this would be opposed.
There are many schools in the Atlanta, Georgia area that were built in the pre-WWII era or earlier that are obsolete, energy-inefficient and unable to support modern technology without major upgrades.
On the plus side, these grants would stimulate the local and national economies by the use of companies and suppliers for renovations as well as saves money in the long-run by making these facilities efficient in their use of energy - something that is desperately needed.
In my opinion, we can't afford not to do this.
JamesSwidergal
May 18, 2009, 2:21pm (report abuse)I oppose it, maybe you and your kids need to take a look at telecommuting instead of spending money on bricks and mortar projects that don't serve the common good. I'm tired of every time something new comes we the taxpayer has to pay for it.
Elementary schools need to teach back to the basics readin' writin' and rithmetic. Stick to the basics for the first eight years and the rest will take care of itself.
John Clark | TRIRIGA
June 14, 2009, 6:38pm (report abuse)It is worth noting that a study on the cost and benefits of green buildings within California showed that 6.2 million children, teachers and administrators – one fifth of California’s population – spend their day inside schools. The same report concludes that the green buildings standards required within this bill also drive higher test scores among students.
Diego
June 18, 2009, 11:48am (report abuse)WildPeach: Look up. It appears there are 163 reasons for every family in America to oppose this. That doesn't mean that the goals aren't worthy; but it just might mean that there are better things to do with the money.
Despite the apparent attitude of the current administration, money is a commodity for which there is a limited supply. We have to pick and choose. My experience suggests that private money is spent more wisely because it's their own money.
VP1
September 3, 2010, 1:03pm (report abuse)Evidence and data support the immediacy of taking a proactive stance on modernizing public facilities. Neither labor nor material costs will be significantly reduced in the future. The costs of fuel and likelihood of other disasters like the Deepwater Horizon ARE going to increase as supplies of natural resources dwindle.
In response to Diego. It was PRIVATE MONETARY POLICY that got us into the disaster on Wall Street, excessive Congressional subsidies to PRIVATE industry and corporate entities, AS WELL AS, the expenses of a protracted War (military pay, defense contracting, PRIVATE contracting, and largess/grease/bribes). It was the disbursement of PUBLIC funds that put the brakes on financial collapse.