How People Voted
13% For, 87% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
P.L. 110-299, A bill to clarify the circumstances during which the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and applicable States may require permits for discharges from certain vessels, and to require the Administrator to conduct a study of discharges incidental to the normal operation of vessels (1 comment ↓ | 5 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
S. 3298 would clarify the circumstances during which the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and applicable States may require permits for discharges from certain vessels, and it would require the Administrator to conduct a study of discharges incidental to the normal operation of vessels.
()
Learn More
There was no up-or-down vote in the House.
There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
Jane Marie
August 15, 2008, 12:10pm (report abuse)In 1995 my family and I were exposed to a chemical called Dinitrogen Tetroxide, N2O4. It was reported that there were only 40 persons who were seriously injured, but, attorneys decided to make it a mass class action. 17 people went to trial in Hinds County, Mississippi none were found to have injuries so the total of awards was put on my family. We still have not been compensated since the attorneys involved wish for us to die.
http://www.mftms13.wordpress.com