How People Voted
 |
 |
42% For, 58% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
Discussion: S. 2756, The Child Protection Improvements Act of 2008 (3 comments ↓ | 7 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
No discussion on this article yet.
Cost per :
Learn More
Visitor Comments 
Entrench
July 2, 2008, 2:08pm (report abuse)I don't understand objecting to this bill if someone who disagrees with it could post their reasoning I'd be curious. The cost to the taxpayer is minimal but since the DOJ is charging to run the background check the cost could be mostly if not entirely offset. All of this is not to mention the fact that it may assist in keeping known predators away from children.
ROBIN
July 21, 2008, 9:56am (report abuse)I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE DEBATE IS ITS MINIMAL COST FOR CHILDRENS PROTECTION ITS A NO BRAINER IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN SIGNED AND PASSED RIGHT FROM THE START I HAVE PERSONALLY BEEN WORKING HARD ON THESE HAVE MANY PETITIONS AND WRITTEN MANY LETTERS TO SENATOR BIDEN THE ONLY PEOPLE AGAINST THIS ARE THE PREDATORS
Phoenix
August 28, 2008, 8:49am (report abuse)Robin, you still haven't really answered any of the questions... Why are you for a bill that is AGAINST our Consitutition???
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
From the Blog
Senator Biden’s Priorities
Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) will be Senator Barack Obama’s (D-IL) running mate. A Bloomberg story says the Biden pick is “aimed at addressing questions about Obama’s inexperience on international affairs, his biggest vulnerability again...