Home

Blog

How People Voted

42% For, 58% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 2756, The Child Protection Improvements Act of 2008 (3 comments ↓ | 7 wiki edits: view article ↓)

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

S. 2756 would amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to establish a permanent background check system.

(read more ↓)


Cost per :

From the Blog

Senator Biden’s Priorities

Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) will be Senator Barack Obama’s (D-IL) running mate. A Bloomberg story says the Biden pick is “aimed at addressing questions about Obama’s inexperience on international affairs, his biggest vulnerability again...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Entrench

July 2, 2008, 2:08pm (report abuse)

I don't understand objecting to this bill if someone who disagrees with it could post their reasoning I'd be curious. The cost to the taxpayer is minimal but since the DOJ is charging to run the background check the cost could be mostly if not entirely offset. All of this is not to mention the fact that it may assist in keeping known predators away from children.

ROBIN

July 21, 2008, 9:56am (report abuse)

I DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT THE DEBATE IS ITS MINIMAL COST FOR CHILDRENS PROTECTION ITS A NO BRAINER IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN SIGNED AND PASSED RIGHT FROM THE START I HAVE PERSONALLY BEEN WORKING HARD ON THESE HAVE MANY PETITIONS AND WRITTEN MANY LETTERS TO SENATOR BIDEN THE ONLY PEOPLE AGAINST THIS ARE THE PREDATORS

Phoenix

August 28, 2008, 8:49am (report abuse)

Robin, you still haven't really answered any of the questions... Why are you for a bill that is AGAINST our Consitutition???

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)