S. 2661 would prohibit the collection of identifying information of individuals by false, fraudulent, or deceptive means through the Internet, a practice known as "phishing", and it would provide the Federal Trade Commission the necessary authority to enforce such prohibition.
Detailed Summary
Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008 or the APCPA - Makes it unlawful for a person to fraudulently: (1) solicit identifying information from a protected computer; (2) use a domain name in violation of the Trademark Act of 1946; (3) use a domain name in an electronic mail message, an instant message, or on a Web page; or (4) register a domain name in any domain name registration authority.
Makes it unlawful for a domain name authority to replace or materially alter the contents of, or restrict access to, any domain name registrant's name or other identifying information in any domain name registration authority database if the authority has received written notice that the use of such domain name is in violation of any provision of this Act.
Authorizes civil actions by state officials (except during the pendency of a federal action), interactive computer services, and trademark owners.
Provides for enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and certain other agencies.
Provides for fines and/or imprisonment for violators.
Preempts inconsistent state laws, but allows state laws that provide greater protection.
Status of the Legislation
Latest Major Action: 2/25/2008: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Points in Favor
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
Points Against
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
Visitor Comments
Ron James
At first glance, the "Anti-Phishing Consumer Protection Act of 2008" seems to be about reducing phishing and online fraud. However a closer examination of the bill reveals provisions that could have chilling effects for millions of honest domain name owners.
Buried inside the harmless-sounding "Anti-Phishing" bill is language that would allow governments and big businesses to take away the websites of individuals and small businesses without the due process protection that is embodied in current trademark law and domain resolution procedures.
All that the government or big business needs to assert is that the individual or small business website uses words that could be confusing. The Bill includes criminal penalties and massive fines. Targeted measures to reduce phishing deserve our support. The Trojan horse language hidden in this bill that would allow governments and big businesses to take away property from individuals and small business should be removed.