How People Voted
 |
 |
18% For, 82% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
Discussion: S. 154, The Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Energy Act of 2007 (1 comment ↓)
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
No discussion on this article yet.
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Ray Swartz
June 14, 2007, 6:23am (report abuse)No. This technology does not deserve taxpayer subsidies. If it is economical, it should pay for itself. And we know that it is harmful to the environment.
I think that all energy subsidies should be repealed and we should rely on a free market while enforcing strict enviromental laws. The government should not meddle in the market, except with regard to the environment.