How People Voted
46% For, 54% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
P.L. 110-84, The College Cost Reduction Act of 2007 (35 comments ↓ | 17 wiki edits: view article ↓)
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
H.R. 2669 would provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 601 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2008.
Detailed Summary
<b>(This measure has not been amended since the Conference Report was filed in the House on September 6, 2007. The summary of that version is repeated here.)</b>
College Cost Reduction and Access Act - <b>Title I: Grants to Students in Attendance at Institutions of Higher Education</b> - (Sec. 101) Amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA) to repeal the formula for calculating an individual Pell grant which includes, in part, the sum of the student's tuition. (Thus eliminates the "tuition sensitivity provision" which currently prohibits maximum Pell grant awards to students attending low-tuition institutions of higher education (IHEs) even if their income is low enough otherwise to qualify for the maximum award.) Authorizes and appropriates $11 million for FY2008 to cover the costs of eliminating tuition sensitivity.
(Sec. 102) Reauthorizes the Pell Grant program through FY2017. Authorizes and appropriates additional funding for the program for FY2008-FY2017 to increase the amount of the maximum Pell grant for which a student is eligible by $490 for each of the award years 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, $690 for each of the award years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012, and $1,900 for award year 2012-2013.
(Sec. 103) Authorizes and appropriates $57 million for each of FY2008-FY2011 to provide assistance to all Upward Bound projects that did not receive assistance in FY2007 and have a grant score above 70.
(Sec. 104) Establishes a TEACH Grant program, providing $4,000 of tuition assistance each academic year to high-achieving undergraduate, post-baccalaureate, and graduate students who commit to teaching a high-need subject in a high-need elementary or secondary school for four years. Includes mathematics, science, foreign languages, bilingual education, special education, and reading among such high-need subjects.
Sets an $16,000 aggregate limit on an individual's receipt of TEACH Grants.
<b>Title II: Student Loan Benefits, Terms, and Conditions</b> - (Sec. 201) Phases-in cuts in the interest rate charged undergraduate student borrowers under the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) and Direct Loan (DL) programs, thereby reducing such rate from 6.8% in July 2006 to 3.4% in July 2011.
(Sec. 202) Eliminates the three-year deferment limit under the FFEL, DL, and Perkins loan (PL) programs for borrowers who are serving on active duty or performing qualifying National Guard duty during a war or other military operation or national emergency. Extends such deferment for 180 days after demobilization. Removes language limiting such deferments to loans for which the first disbursement was made after June 2001.
(Sec. 203) Caps FFEL and DL repayments by student borrowers at no more than 15% of the amount a borrower's and the borrower's spouse's adjusted gross income exceeds 150% of the poverty line. Requires the Secretary of Education to pay any unpaid interest on such loans for up to three years, and cancel or repay them after 25 years.
(Sec. 204) Allows veterans who were called to active duty when enrolled in, or within six months of being enrolled in, an IHE to receive a 13-month student loan deferment. Cancels such deferment upon the borrower's reenrollment in school.
(Sec. 205) Includes FFEL, DL, and PL economic hardship deferral periods, as well as the months a borrower's FFEL or DL payments are capped, in calculating the maximum period an income contingent repayment plan may be in effect for a non-defaulting borrower.
<b>Title III: Federal Family Education Loan Program</b> - (Sec. 301) Reduces from 23% to 16% the percentage of defaulted FFEL collections a guaranty agency may retain, beginning in October 2007.
(Sec. 302) Eliminates exceptional performer status for lenders, servicers, and guaranty agencies, which rewards such entities for high due diligence in FFEL collection, beginning in October 2007.
(Sec. 303) Reduces FFEL lender insurance to 95% of the unpaid principal of such loans, beginning in FY2013. Provides total coverage to lenders-of-last-resort.
(Sec. 304) Redefines economic hardship so that it describes the condition of borrowers whose full-time earnings do not exceed the greater of the minimum wage or 150% of the poverty line. Requires consideration, in determining economic hardship, of the poverty line applicable to the borrower's family size, rather than the one applicable to a family of two.
Defines eligible not-for-profit holders of FFELs. Provides that: (1) such holders must have been acting as eligible lenders upon this Act's enactment, unless they are trustees acting on behalf of such lenders; and (2) if such holders sell their loans to entities that are not not-for-profit holders, their special allowance payments will be calculated using the rates applicable to such entities.
(Sec. 305) Changes the formula for calculating special allowance payments (SAPs) made to FFEL lenders, to compensate them for the difference between FFEL interest rates and market rates, by reducing the lender rate: (1) by 0.40 percentage points for loans held by nonprofit lenders; and (2) by 0.55 percentage points for all other lenders. Equalizes the SAP rate for FFEL Stafford and PLUS loans.
Increases the loan fee charged FFEL lenders from .5% to 1% of the principal amount of loans first disbursed after September 2007. Prohibits its collection from borrowers.
(Sec. 306) Lowers the account maintenance fee paid to FFEL guarantors from .10% to .06% of the original principal amount of active loans they have guaranteed.
<b>Title IV: Loan Forgiveness</b> - (Sec. 401) Cancels the DL balance owed by borrowers who, after October 1, 2007, have made 120 payments under income-based or standard repayment plans while employed in certain public service jobs.
<b>Title V: Federal Perkins Loans</b> - (Sec. 501) Delays the date after which IHEs must begin distributing late PL collections to the Secretary from March 31, 2012, to October 1, 2012.
<b>Title VI: Need Analysis</b> - (Sec. 601) Increases students' eligibility for financial aid under title IV of the HEA by increasing, by academic year 2012-2013, the income protection allowance to: (1) $6,000 for a dependent student; (2) $9,330 for an independent student without dependents, other than perhaps a spouse, who is single, separated, or married, and where both spouses are enrolled; and (3) $14,960 for an independent student without dependents other than a spouse if only one of the couple is enrolled. Provides for cost-of-living adjustments to such amounts.
Increases through academic year 2012-2013 the income protection allowances in the table for independent students with dependents other than a spouse, with cost-of-living adjustments to such amounts thereafter.
Revises the table of income protection allowances for parents of dependent students, for each academic year after academic year 2008-2009, by increasing such amounts by the percentage increase in the cost-of-living since December 1992.
(Sec. 602) Makes dependent students eligible for a simplified means test if one of their parents is a dislocated worker or they or their parents received a means-tested federal benefit within the past two years (currently, one year). Makes independent students eligible for a simplified means test if they or their spouses are dislocated workers and they have received a means-tested federal benefit within the past two years.
Raises from $20,000 to $30,000 the zero-expected family contributions income limit which allows students in families with incomes below such limit to qualify for the maximum Pell grant award. Provides for cost-of-living adjustments to such amount.
Includes the dislocated worker status of a family member within the special circumstances giving financial aid administrators extra discretion in making need analyses.
(Sec. 603) Includes the recent unemployment of an independent student, the dislocated worker status of a family member, and homelessness within the special circumstances giving financial aid administrators extra discretion in making need analyses.
(Sec. 604) Excludes untaxed distributions from qualified education benefits as income or assets in computing expected family contributions in student aid calculations.
Excludes welfare benefits, Earned Income Tax Credits, federal special fuels tax credits, untaxed foreign income, untaxed Social Security benefits, and the additional federal child tax credit from the income and benefits which are considered untaxed and thereby included in student need analyses.
Includes in the definition of independent students those who: (1) are in foster care; (2) are emancipated minors or in legal guardianship; and (3) have been verified as unaccompanied homeless children or youth or as unaccompanied, at risk of homelessness, and self-supporting. States that a financial aid administrator may make a determination of independence based on a documented determination made by another financial aid administrator in the same award year.
Excludes special combat pay, received by military personnel because of exposure to a hazardous situation, from student need analyses or from consideration as financial assistance.
Treats a qualified education benefit as: (1) the parent's asset when considering the family contribution for a dependent student; and (2) the student's asset when considering such contribution for independent students.
Excludes from need analyses any untaxed distributions from state prepaid tuition plans or Coverdell education savings accounts.
<b>Title VII: Competitive Loan Auction Pilot Program -</b> (Sec. 701) Directs the Secretary to conduct a Competitive Loan Auction Pilot program, beginning in July 2009, under which biennial auctions are held in each state allowing prequalified lenders to compete for the exclusive right to make FFEL program PLUS loans at all IHEs within the state. Provides that the winning bids from each state auction shall be the two bids containing the lowest and the second lowest proposed special allowance payments requested from the Secretary. Requires the Secretary to guarantee 99% of the unpaid balance of such loans.
<b>Title VIII: Partnership Grants</b> - (Sec. 801) Establishes a College Access Challenge Grant program requiring the Secretary to provide formula matching grants to states for specified activities and services to improve student access to postsecondary education. Requires that such grants cover two-thirds of program costs, with states responsible for the remainder. Requires the Secretary to reduce a state's grant to the extent it fails to provide the full non-federal share and authorizes the award of the amount of such reduction directly to a philanthropic organization to carry out the program.
Lists as allowable grant activities and services: (1) information to students and parents on postsecondary education benefits; (2) information on financing options that promote financial literacy and debt management among students and parents; (3) outreach for at-risk students; (4) assistance in completing the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) or other common financial reporting forms; (5) need-based grant aid for students; (6) professional development for middle school and high school guidance counselors, and college financial aid administrators and admissions counselors; and (7) student loan cancellation, repayment, or interest rate reductions for borrowers employed in high-need geographical areas or professions. Requires states to give service priority to low-income students and families. Authorizes and appropriates $66 million for the program for each of FY2008 and FY2009.
(Sec. 802) Makes $255 million for each of FY2008-FY2012 available to minority-serving institutions, with: (1) $100 million going to Hispanic-serving institutions; (2) $100 million going to Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Predominantly Black institutions; and (3) $55 million going to Tribal Colleges and Universities, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-serving institutions, Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-serving institutions, and Native American-serving nontribal institutions.
Defines Predominantly Black institutions as accredited institutions serving at least 1,000 undergraduate students at least: (1) 50% of whom are pursuing a bachelor's or associate's degree; (2) 40% of whom are Black Americans; and (3) 50% of whom are low-income or first-generation college students. Requires the spending per full-time undergraduate student of such institutions to be low in comparison to that of institutions offering similar instruction.
Defines Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander-serving institutions as accredited institutions that have a significant enrollment of financially needy students and an enrollment of undergraduate students that are at least 10% Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander students. Requires the spending per full-time undergraduate student of such institutions to be low in comparison to that of institutions offering similar instruction.
Defines Native American-serving nontribal institutions as IHEs that have an enrollment of undergraduate students that are at least 10% Native American students and are not Tribal Colleges and Universities.
Requires that funds for Predominantly Black institutions be available for competitive grants for programs in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, health education, international affairs, teacher preparation, or to improve the educational outcomes of African American males.
Requires that funds for the other institutions be used for certain capacity-building activities. Sets spending priorities for Hispanic-serving institutions and Historically Black Colleges and Universities that include education in disciplines in which minorities and low-income students are underrepresented and, in the case of Hispanic-serving institutions, the development of model transfer and articulation agreements.
Status of the Legislation
Latest Major Action: 9/19/2007: Presented to President.
Points in Favor
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
Points Against
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
(read more ↓)
[41 views]
Cost per :
Learn More
See How Your Representatives Voted:
See Related Bills:
- The College Cost Reduction and Access Act Technical Amendments of 2007 (H.R. 4153) (more recent activity!)
- A bill to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to make technical corrections (P.L. 110-153) (more recent activity!)
See Bills on the Same Subject:
Administrative fees, Aid to dependent children, Alaska, Armed forces, Armed forces reserves, Asian American ethnic groups, Auctions, Authorization, Black colleges, Budgets, Business, Capital punishment, Cash welfare block grants, Charities, Child welfare, Children, Collection of accounts, College administration, College costs, Communications, Consumer education, Consumers, Cost control, Cost of living adjustments, Criminal justice, Cuba, Data banks, Debt, Debtor and creditor, Defense policy, Department of Education, Disabled, Distance education, Dropouts, Earned income tax credit, Economic policy, Education, Education of the disadvantaged, Education savings accounts, Educational research, Educational technology, Elementary and secondary education, Elementary education, Emergency management, Environmental protection, Executive departments, Families, Federal aid to education, Federal-state relations, Federally-guaranteed loans, Fees, Finance, Financial services, Fire fighters, Foster home care, Government employees, Government information, Government lending, Government paperwork, Government publicity, Graduate education, Guardian and ward, Hawaiians, Health policy, Higher education, Hispanic Americans, Homeless, Housing, Income tax, Indexing (Economic policy), Indian education, Indians, Indigenous peoples, Interest rates, Intergovernmental fiscal relations, Labor, Language and languages, Law, Law enforcement officers, Loan defaults, Mathematics, Medical care, Medical education, Medicine, Mentoring, Military pay, Military personnel, Minorities, Minority education, National Guard, National service, Natural resources, Nonprofit organizations, Nurses, Nursing education, Old age, survivors and disability insurance, Pacific Islanders, Paramedical personnel, Personal budgets, Police, Pregnant women, Preschool education, Prisoners of war, Public defenders, Public health personnel, Public prosecutors, Reading, Retired military personnel, Scholarships, Science policy, Scientific education, Secondary education, Social security, Social services, Social work, Special education, Speech disorders, State and local government, Student employment, Student loan funds, Subsidies, Sustainable development, Taxation, Teacher education, Teacher supply and demand, Teachers, Technology, Telecommunication, Terrorism, Terrorists, Veterans, Veterans' education, Welfare, Women (more subjects ↓)
See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
Education, Training, Employment and Social Services
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
Dawn
August 22, 2007, 4:09pm (report abuse)This is great America needs high skilled workers. Sallie Mae and other organizations should pay for it. They sure make enough on student loans.
pcalgold
September 10, 2007, 2:22pm (report abuse)I looked at the bill. What exactly are the reforms? The "lower" interests rates kick in very gradually over five years, in five years the new rate which is low by today's comparisons may be high.
The reductions apparently do not apply to former students currently paying loans. Maybe I'm reading things wrong--how does the bill benefit the former student now attempting to pay back his or her loans?
Clyde Longwood
September 12, 2007, 1:05pm (report abuse)It is curious that in this bill aid to government workers such a firemen is limited to those paid $65,000 or less, while under the John R. "Justice" Bill cetain attorneys would get a $60k break on their student loan.
Clyde Longwood
September 12, 2007, 1:07pm (report abuse)I meant to add--that's regardless of what the attorney is paid.
Dexter
September 12, 2007, 6:29pm (report abuse)Yeah, it looks like congress is trying to do something to help people, but why is it that most people won't get much assistance but wealthy attorneys are going to get $60,000.00. I guess that's politics for ya.
Alexis
September 13, 2007, 2:34pm (report abuse)I see comments here about wealthy attorneys getting a break. I work in the public sector as an attorney. We do not get wealthy - those that work at big firms do. We also have to continue to work for lower salaries than much higher paid attorneys for 10 years to receive the loan forgiveness.
It should also be noted, that the bill benefits teachers, firefighters, and others in the public sector. They could be doing other things with their careers and making a lot more money, but decided not to. This will be a good way to help those of us in the public sector struggling to pay back school debt.
Jack Paradise
September 14, 2007, 7:03pm (report abuse)Alexis is right most government attorneys do not get wealthy. I think the point that one looks at this bill side by side with the bill to help public defenders and state's attorneys there is a great deal of irrationality at play. In this bill there are significant requirments before one can receive aid. In the bill effecting the law profession, one can start to receive the $60k benefit without any year requirment, and would include the attorneys in the relatively high income bracket-although almost always, the attorneys getting rich are the ones at big firms, not the ones at small firms many who help poor consumers, legal aid attorneys, or those in government. The people pushed for the bill sucessfully mischaracterized the situation as being public vs. private in wealth disparity when in reality it is the few at big firms vs. the many at just about every other job in law.
Can Somebody Explain
September 15, 2007, 2:16pm (report abuse)Reading through this bill and the summary provided on this site it appears that public attorneys (unless they are public defenders or district attorneys) only get loan forgiveness if they were making contingent payments for a full 10 years and that one would have to be almost at the poverty line to qualify for the contingent payments. But--looking at the separate bill, applicable only to public defenders and district attorneys, those attorneys get the benefit right away (with a signed 3 year commitment), regardless of their income. Is this right. (Not is it good policy, am I understanding this correctly). Now if this is right is this right (in the policy sense).
dlg
September 16, 2007, 12:41pm (report abuse)more for working students maybe? th
Mia
September 24, 2007, 9:32am (report abuse)How about this: get the government out of higher education and then the prices will go down and most Americans will be able to afford it.
Throwing more money at higher education causes more inflation. The two sectors of the economy that have inflation rates higher than the economy overall are higher education and health care. These are also the two sectors that have the most government interference and influence. Government is the problem, not the solution.
Connie Z
September 24, 2007, 1:07pm (report abuse)Or how about limiting what a college or university can charge its students if it wants to receive the benefit of
having its students with federally sponsored student loans.
Mobius
September 27, 2007, 1:00am (report abuse)It seems like the repayment plan isn't all that great for gov't attorneys. They have to make 120 payments on federal subsidized loans before they get the benefit of loan forgiveness, and the have to be in the service of gov't the entire time. (I'm reading the Enrolled bill.) It looks like it doesn't cover the private loans that most law students have to take out. So in reality, the benefit of this bill is marginal and delayed. I don't think this is a large incentive for attorneys to enter gov't and public interest service.
Scott
September 27, 2007, 1:31pm (report abuse)I could not possibly agree with Mia more... the consumer is who should benefit and that only comes with competition. Get government out of student loans.
Jamie
September 28, 2007, 7:50pm (report abuse)When and how will we know when this passes and how soon can I have my debt. forgiven.
Johnny-B
September 28, 2007, 9:41pm (report abuse)I am a teacher, with a Ph.D. (and with a MOUNTAIN of students debt). I cannot WAIT till I can take advantage of the loan forgiveness. You have to jump through some hoops (being on a certain payment plan & waiting 10 long years - whew, almost a lifetime), but to have it ALL forgiven is a GODsent! - Thanks Uncle (Sam :-) - I'll be debt free in a decade!! :-)
Mia
October 1, 2007, 12:20am (report abuse)Johnny-B:
You are very welcome.
signed,
Your poor and cash strapped Uncle Sam (the taxpayers)
Sharon
October 1, 2007, 2:18pm (report abuse)I am still trying to figure the whole thing out. I work for a public school district as the director of school nutrition. I owe over $100,000 in student loans. I am hoping I can get on the band wagon with this forgiveness thing.
Bob Shireman
October 1, 2007, 7:10pm (report abuse)For a helpful Q&A about the forgiveness provisions for public service and the income based repayment plan in this new law, see the web site at www.projectonstudent.org.
Travis
October 2, 2007, 5:49pm (report abuse)What about those of us dealing with Sallie Mae? How does this apply to us? If FFEL is allowing Sallie Mae to do student loans, shouldn't that make us eligible under the new 15% rule?
Hector
October 5, 2007, 12:52am (report abuse)I have been in the military for more than 10 years. I have served directly in two wars. I have also been paying on student loans for more than ten years. Do I now have to pay for another 10 years to be eligible for forgiveness? Is my service to this country considered as public service?
Mary
October 12, 2007, 11:41am (report abuse)People who have ALREADY worked in the public sector for 10 years, and who have ALREADY made 120 payments and who have made under $65,000--WAY UNDER--should be able to have their loans forgiven also!
Patty
October 23, 2007, 3:45pm (report abuse)How do I find out the forgiveness provisions for public service?
Kimberly
October 24, 2007, 12:11pm (report abuse)Would like to know if working for a AAA state agency as a Adult Protective Service Investigator is in the public service umbrella. I have huge law school loans and chose to assist low income seniors rather than work for the corporate law firms with the large income.
Cindy
October 27, 2007, 12:58am (report abuse)Why isn't there a law capping the INTEREST on student loans. That is why people are struggling. Also a law that will allow student loan borrows to CONSOLIDATE more than 1 time. And NO PENALTY for paying it off.
Cindy
October 27, 2007, 1:14am (report abuse)I also wanted to add that there should be regulations on the payment amounts. I was told over and over if I could not pay the full amount of the payment, I had to get a forbearance or a deferrment. This is unfair to families raising children. Now I Have used up all of my forbearance and my student loan is more than twice the amount that I borrowed.
Kim
November 1, 2007, 2:47pm (report abuse)How do we know if our spouse's income is "applicable"?
tpb
December 19, 2007, 10:13am (report abuse)I have been working in the public sector for six years. I have been paying my 90K+ student loans during that time. Does this bill mean that the rates on those federal loans will automatically reduce? Does this mean that in four more years my federal loans will disappear? Or does this only apply to persons who start paying loans after 10-1-07? If it does count for those of us currently working an in repayment, what do we need to do?
Joelle
December 20, 2007, 11:12am (report abuse)I have been paying on my loan for 8 years. I think it's a shame that these 8 years will count for nothing! I am a social worker.
steve
December 27, 2007, 4:11pm (report abuse)Don't get too excited folks! I am a 6 yr. law grad working as a state asst. prosecutor making beans but loving my job. Looks as though there is a cap of 65K salary and that the 10 year repayment period began 10/01/07. So if I just work here until 10/01/17 and make paupers wages while continuing to make my ever-increasing graduated payments I can discharge roughly 35K. FANTASTIC!
Carl Hanning
January 27, 2008, 4:38pm (report abuse)I was recently recognized by my tribe and given enrollment, now I 69 years old with a student loan of over a $100,000 to pay back, all of this just to find a job that I started at 60 years old; they will probably send me my last bil after I dead. HELP topish2003@yahoo.com
Jill Ziegler
February 4, 2008, 7:15pm (report abuse)There has been concern that while this bill does didly apparently breaks are being given specifically to assistant state's attorneys and assistant public defenders regardless of their incomes in another bill called the "John R. Justice Act". Can anyone explain or give the details?
Jill Ziegler
February 4, 2008, 7:20pm (report abuse)Clarification: "Steve's" comment above suggests that there is a income cap contrary to the draft of the "John R. Justice Act" which was published on this site.
Kerri
February 17, 2008, 8:20pm (report abuse)Can someone tell me how to get information on how to apply for this loan forgiveness?
Elaine
June 8, 2008, 6:16pm (report abuse)I have also been a teacher for 15 years, and of course get no back credit- which is how politicians have designed student loan legislation throughout the years. The "benefits", they create, particulary for new borrowers, are funded by the existing borrowers. This allows them to look magnanimous without having accomplished much of a "benefit" for anyone. HR 2669 also does not include ANY consumer protection from Sallie Mae and other lender abuses. I have just received my first notice today saying that I owe my ex-husband's student loan from 16 years ago. The interest alone has more than doubled the amount to over $18,000. I thought I was being responsible paying my $400 per month to Sallie Mae. Silly me.
Louise
August 12, 2008, 12:05pm (report abuse)Can someone explain to me how exactly this bill will benefit college students,or recent grads, with a student loan that are working for a non-profit organization?