Home

Blog

How People Voted

44% For, 56% Against
131 votes cast

P.L. 110-114, The Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (3 comments ↓ | 10 wiki edits: view article ↓)

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

H.R. 1495 would provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, and it would authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States.

(read more ↓)


Cost per :

Learn More

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

B4berkley

April 19, 2007, 5:19am (report abuse)

1st of all the government doesn't need any more land. It's not a private business.

2nd, Why is it this mentality is so popular, I should have to pay for people to live in dangerous areas?

My money should help make it safer for someone to live in a flood plain or a coastal town ravaged by some type of catastrophy, wouldn't it be less expensive to just buy them a house

somewhere safer?

My pockets have been stretched with

a penny here and a penny there.

Over 12,000 in income tax this year. ehhh, what's another 98?

GreatDanes

September 28, 2007, 7:54pm (report abuse)

Every thing should be put on hold as they are killing us in this country with all the sneaky bills. Vote NO

wiscobiscuit

October 2, 2007, 9:50am (report abuse)

The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and its resultant erosion of critical wetlands and barriers was a (maybe the) major contributing factor in the devastation in south Louisiana. Shutting down this ill-conceived and little-used boondoggle is my tax dollars well-spent. If (when) this legislation is vetoed, this concern must be introduced as a stand-alone appropriation. MR-GO's gotta go.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)