Home

Blog

What People Think

55% For, 45% Against

Take Action

Vote on this Bill
For
Against
Speak Out
Comment on this Bill
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 4248, The Ensuring Medicare Access to Recreational Therapy Act of 2007 (7 comments ↓)

H.R. 4248 would ensure access to recreational therapy in inpatient rehabilitation facilities, inpatient psychiatric facilities, and skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare Program.

(read more ↓)


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

G

This bill is essential in protecting clients and ensuring that they receive the most appropriate services and that the services they receive are delivered by competent professionals.

DT

This Bill is not necessary because the provision of recreational therapy has been a part of the regulations for years. The provision for recreation therapy has been part of the therapy reimbursement bundle since the system was instituted.

Also, on another note, I have looked at the curriculum for therapeutic recreators from all colleges in my state, and they have one or no courses dealing with the elderly. I have also had several with TR degrees on staff, who were less capable than some of the staff with 2 year educations, who had completed internships in Long Term care, and therefore, had more experience than the CTRS. Being a CTRS does not make them any more qualified to deliver services to the elderly than some other disciplines. Their curriculum is not geared toward the elderly.

Because the provision for Rec Therapy has always been a part of the regulations, I question the motives of the CTRS' introducing this bill.

LL

DT stated that the curriculum is not geared toward the elderly. I will have to agree that is not but neither is the profession. Recreational therapy assists all individual with illness, disease, or disability to ensure his or her recovery from a holistic approach. When individuals go through rehab they are going to remember the person the most who help them get back to doing the things that they enjoyed doing. I encourage you to look at empirical based research that shows recreational therapy interventions just as effective if not more than our sister disciplines.

ME

THIS BILL IS ESSENTIAL IN THE FUTURE OF THE CTRS AND WILL PROVIDE SECURITY AND PROTECTION TO US AS A HEALTH-CARE RELATED CAREER. WE ARE JUST AS VITAL TO THE CONSUMER AS THE OT AND PT DISCIPLINES AND WORKING TOGETHER CAN FURTHER ENSURE THE CONSUMERS' SUCCESSFUL OUTCOMES IN REHABILITATION SETTINGS. SUPPORT THIS BILL!

SJS

This bill is extremely important to the profession of Recreational Therapy as well as to the benefit of all its consumers who are served by the profession. Recreational Therapy serves a wide variety of consituants just as PT and OT and none of the above have speciality degrees in one population or the other. However, they are all essential and work together to better serve their clients. Support this Bill!

STAR

This bill is essential for bringing increased priority to RT and related increased opportunity for consumers to gain the uniquely valuable positive outcomes that RT can and does acheive. This bill will help gain the attention of Providers who have not been motivated (or lack understanding of need) to offer this service that has demonstrated successful client outcomes much more cost efficiently than the therapies they already provide. Please support this bill.

G

DT- Your comment concerns me, because while Recreational Therapy has been included in the "other services" category. Hospitals are often hesitant to include it as a billable service, because other professions are specifically listed. If you list one, list them all... or don't list any.

The motivation behind the bill is to protect consumers. Without it, there's nothing to prevent individuals with poor training to provide 'rt' services. It also ensures that consumers have the option of RT services. It's not to say that RT is the end all/be all for every patient. But it is more effective for some. Thus, they should have the option.

As for your comment about the elderly. Most schools offer core classes. This is not to say that those classes are the ONLY classes a student takes. If gerontology is their interest, then I would hope they would supplement their education with relevant courses. In fact, it's likely that the university adviser would strongly encourage it.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_HR_4248.html

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)