See Related Bills:
See Bills on the Same Subject:
Administrative procedure, Air pollution, Alternative energy sources, Armed forces, Aviation fuels, Budgets, Building construction, Business, Carbon cycle, Carbon dioxide, Coal, Coal liquefaction, Congress, Congressional reporting requirements, Construction costs, Cooperative societies, Defense contracts, Defense economics, Defense policy, Department of Energy, Depreciation and amortization, Diesel motor, Energy, Energy facilities, Energy research, Energy storage, Environmental health, Environmental protection, Environmental research, Executive departments, Federally-guaranteed loans, Finance, Gas industry, Government lending, Governmental investigations, Health policy, Income tax, Investment tax credit, Laboratories, Law, Licenses, Medical care, Methane, Military bases, Minimum tax, Motor vehicle pollution control, Natural resources, Petroleum, Petroleum industry, Petroleum reserves, Petroleum storage, Public contracts, Public health, Public lands, Research and development, Research and development facilities, Research centers, Science policy, Secondary recovery of gas, Secondary recovery of oil, Strategic materials, Synthetic fuel, Tax credits, Tax deductions, Tax returns, Taxation, Transportation (more subjects ↓)
See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
N/A
Visitor Comments
aries333
February 13, 2007, 9:05pm (report abuse)This one needs to pass...a matter of national security.
GCourt3
May 17, 2007, 10:05pm (report abuse)extremely urgent and necessary to safeguard our security and liberty from external energy dependency
Scared
June 7, 2007, 12:30pm (report abuse)What about the pollution that comes out of the burning of this fuel? hmmm? look it up.
onlyjus
July 5, 2007, 9:13am (report abuse)If you use coal and biomass as feedstocks as well as employ carbon sequestration, it is feasible to make “carbon neutral" fuels.