How People Voted
 |
 |
31% For, 69% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
Discussion: H.R. 2768, The S-MINER Act (3 comments ↓ | 9 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
No discussion on this article yet.
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Doyle D. Fink, Retired M/lNM District Manager
July 24, 2007, 10:36pm (report abuse)HR 2768 is an outstanding bill, now all you will need is some staff with enough balls to enforce the ACT. Keep up the good work this will save a lot of lives.
Just wish I was still working with MSHA.
Jerry Hamilton
January 18, 2008, 5:12pm (report abuse)HR 2768 would be detrimental to our country and the industry. It will divert both industry and regulators from their aggressive time and expense placed toward implementing the MINER Act of 2006. Current progress, safety and heath standards will be diverted.
James Ward
March 24, 2008, 4:12pm (report abuse)HR 2768 OVERLOAD! 2006 Statitics from the Department of Labor indicate that mining had less injuries than the medical field. The governments response to increased saftey is increased punishment. 44,000 were killed on our highways! Why don't we focus on that! HR 2768 is a media play!