See Related Bills:
See Bills on the Same Subject:
Actions and defenses, Administrative procedure, Africa (Sub-Saharan), Arms sales, Belarus, Business, Business ethics, Censorship, Central Asia, China, Civil liberties, Civil rights, Communications, Computers, Congress, Congress and foreign policy, Congressional oversight, Congressional reporting requirements, Corporate accountability, Corporation directors, Criminal justice, Cuba, Damages, Democracy, Department of State, East Asia, Economic assistance, Electronic mail systems, Ethiopia, Executive departments, Executive reorganization, Export controls, Fines (Penalties), Foreign aid, Foreign policy, Freedom of information, Freedom of speech, Government information, Government paperwork, Government publicity, Human rights, Information services, Interactive media, International affairs, International broadcasting, Internet, Iran, Laos, Law, Liability (Law), Middle East and North Africa, Military assistance, Negotiations, Opposition (Political science), Political persecution, Politics and government, President and foreign policy, Presidents, Punitive damages, Religion, Religious liberty, Right of privacy, Standards, Stockholders, Technological innovations, Technology, Telecommunication, Telecommunication industry, Trade, Tunisia, Vietnam, Weapons systems, Web sites (more subjects ↓)
See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
International Affairs
Visitor Comments
Ken Udas
December 26, 2007, 4:40am (report abuse)I lead an organization that offers distance education to learners in a number of countries. Our principal mode of delivery is online. I am wondering if H.R. 275 would cover a situation in which a government actor of an “Internet-restricting country” requested the identity of a student or faculty member who produced content within an online course, even if it were legally acceptable to do so in a face-to-face/residential course? For example, materials posted to a discussion forum, published in a course blog or wiki, or a paper or other project stored in the learning management system were requested. If anybody has a thought about this, it would be great.
Ken Udas
December 26, 2007, 4:40am (report abuse)I recently made a blog posting on Terra Incognita (http://blog.worldcampus.psu.edu) titled “The Global Online Freedom Act of 2007 and Open Education.” Terra Incognita is an education related blog that has focused on open source software (OSS), open educational resources (OER). In the posting I provided a bit of background and then posed the following questions:
1) Would this type of legislation (H.R. 275) be useful to educators?
2) Would it potentially serve as a means to free up OER for use in various countries?
3) Does it address fundamental access issues that are precursors for Open Education?
4) More pragmatically, does it potentially pose interesting questions for US universities who partner with universities in foreign countries that require “location of personally identifiable information” of students or faculty, wish to filter content, or block Internet sites?
Please feel free to visit if you are interested.