How People Voted
40% For, 60% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
Discussion: H.R. 2537, The Beach Protection Act of 2007 (4 comments ↓ | 10 wiki edits)
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
No discussion on this article yet.
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
Gary
April 7, 2008, 10:29am (report abuse)the beaches need to be protected
$1.71 isn't bad
Phyllis
April 7, 2008, 2:07pm (report abuse)Washington cannot stay out of the people's pockets.
Helen
April 7, 2008, 4:24pm (report abuse)The US has a lot of coastal water that has the potential of endagering the health of all Americans, not only those who use the ocean for recreation and sport fishing, but polluted sea water can effect major changes in the ecosystem and marine life. This in turn has already affected the seafood sold in the markets. A good website for information on safe seafood is : The Monterey Bay Aquarium website where you can download a seafood guide for regions of the US: www.seafoodwatch.org
Even though this bill seems only to provide a warning for people who use the beaches for recreations, we need to be aware that our sea waters are constantly being invaded by human pollution.
Kreiss
April 9, 2008, 3:45am (report abuse)This is an area where government funding is for a public good, thus, appropriate.