How People Voted
19% For, 81% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
Discussion: H.R. 1784, The PLEA Act (3 comments ↓)
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
No discussion on this article yet.
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
Derek
May 10, 2007, 12:58am (report abuse)It really shows that they know nothing about this weapon or the ammo that they want to ban. ss190 is available to LE only and is already classified as AP, and SS192 is no longer produced by the manufacturer.
Brian
October 24, 2007, 8:34pm (report abuse)This bill makes the assumption that if you buy one of these guns you have the sole intention of using it on an officer of the law. More paranoid moonbat nonsense!!!
Thomas
May 19, 2008, 8:23pm (report abuse)As a retired police officer, I would prefer to carry the Five SeveN (should I choose to carry), and with the production of any frangible bullet, would consider it's high capacity mag as a top reason for a self defense weapon.