Home

Blog

How People Voted

44% For, 56% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 1018, To amend he Animal Health Protection Act to prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from implementing or carrying out a National Animal Identification System or similar requirement and to require the Secretary to protect information obtained as part of any voluntary animal identification system (10 comments ↓)

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

H.R. 1018 would amend the Animal Health Protection Act to prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from implementing or carrying out a National Animal Identification System or similar requirement and to require the Secretary to protect information obtained as part of any voluntary animal identification system.

(read more ↓)


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

NO NAIS

January 6, 2008, 6:36pm (report abuse)

This bill NEEDS to pass. We do not need a mandatory Animal ID program.

Worried

January 6, 2008, 7:06pm (report abuse)

NAIS is going to a lot more damage than good, so we need to pass this bill!

katminpin@aol.com

January 12, 2008, 10:12am (report abuse)

We do not need a mandatory Id Program. Please find a way to get this stopped. This is going to hurt many people, especially the small farmers if NAIS pass's.

Stop NAIS

January 12, 2008, 12:55pm (report abuse)

We need this bill to pass and Prohibit a mandatory system. NAIS is BAD for the economy and small farmers.

Kaye Lyle

January 12, 2008, 10:08pm (report abuse)

Rural farmers depend on cattle for their livliehood. NAIS will put a lot of them out of business.
Why invade the privacy of small livestock owners? I don't believe disease reduction is the issue.

Clay Ramsay

January 17, 2008, 10:05pm (report abuse)

NAIS is one of the worst ideas ever. It would be bad for American agriculture, and it will destroy the principles on which this nation was founded. This is a plan which would fit perfectly in the old Soviet Union or Communist China.

Rikki Meade

January 18, 2008, 3:39pm (report abuse)

If NAIS is forced on the American people I see the end of the small farmer and a way of life. And do not believe for a minute that companion animals will not soon follow and have to be chipped. This has nothing to do with animal health and every thing to do with controlling America's food source. I also resent the fact that 5 family members have been deployed to Iraq to "fight for their freedom" while my own government is doing all it can to take mine away.

Patricia Ward

January 21, 2008, 6:38am (report abuse)

I agree with Clay and Rikki. This would be a horrible mistake and disservice to the American people. The more rights we give up the more "Big Brother" has control over us.

NO NAIS

January 21, 2008, 12:32pm (report abuse)

There is no good reason to pass this bill it would have nothing but a detrimental effect on the livestock business and accomplish nothing positive.

Luana Kelly

June 15, 2008, 10:33pm (report abuse)

This is just another step in taking our rights. This is just plain rediculous for a person to have to report to the government everytime something happens. This country is getting closer and closer to dictatorship. My horses never leave the farm. Please find a way to stop NAIS. It's the small and hobby farmers that are gonna pay the price. This is not right and it should be stopped at all costs.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)