<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 1118, A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the amount of monthly dependency and indemnity compensation payable to surviving spouses by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Corky (November 21, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#144658</link>
<description>I guess I have been busier then usual.  I don't know who the Corky is above, but I certainly did not write that nonsense.  And yes I was very busy.  I do work part time.  As I stated before with HR 2243, the GAO did finish a report as to how much the spouses do really get from the VA.  It seems we get between 35 and 55% of the spouses pay. I don't know how they arived at this figure.  However, it may be why we have not seen action on either bill.  At least they are checking into things....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">144658@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Corky (November 21, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#144773</link>
<description>You don't deserve more. In fact you don't deserve anything. Lowlife losers, all of you....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">144773@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Corky (November 17, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#139806</link>
<description>You don't deserve more. In fact you don't deserve anything. Lowlife losers, all of you....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">139806@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michael J (November 10, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#132693</link>
<description>Has S.1118 A bill to amend Title 38 become law?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">132693@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kathyj (October 29, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#118579</link>
<description>???  Has anyone heard on the outcome?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">118579@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Martin (October 22, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#104544</link>
<description>Does anybody know the outcome of yesterday hearing on S1118?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">104544@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Status as of October 21, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html</link>
<description>10/21/2009: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status:  Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Date of scheduled hearing. SR-418. 9:30 a.m.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">51688@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Corky (October 20, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#100854</link>
<description>The Senate bill also has language reguarding remarriage at 55 rather than 57....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">100854@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Revision by webmaster (October 20, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/111_SN_1118.html?rev=99216</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;S. 1118 would amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the amount of monthly dependency and indemnity compensation payable to surviving spouses by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc0&quot;&gt; Detailed Summary &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Increases the monthly rates of veterans' dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) payable to surviving spouses through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Provides a phase-in of DIC payments in the case of veterans who die of a non-service-connected disability after being eligible for at least five years for VA compensation for a service-connected disability rated as total.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reduces from 57 to 55 the age after which the remarriage of a surviving spouse shall not terminate DIC payments.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc1&quot;&gt; Status of the Legislation &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Latest Major Action: 10/21/2009: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status:  Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Date of scheduled hearing. SR-418. 9:30 a.m.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc2&quot;&gt; Points in Favor &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc3&quot;&gt; Points Against &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">99216@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Corky (October 17, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#93980</link>
<description>Is there some reason Bernice is not correct?  Should this bill not pass I feel that all Federal employee spouses should take a cut to the rate of the surviving spouse of a Military/veteran.  Why should we be entitled to so much less?  What is fair is fair.  If the surviving spouse of any Federal employee receives 55% why does the surviving spouse of a military/Veteran receive between 42% and 43%?  After all they were Federal workers also.K8GW2...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">93980@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bernice/Spouse of deceased Veteran  (September 15, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html#66804</link>
<description>To be fair, if this bill does not pass, is to introduce a bill to lower income of other deceased U.S Government workers spouses to 43 percent too. The spouse of a Veteran  receives DIC income from the VA.  Our income is also at a Federal level. I view this as discrimination against Veterans....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">66804@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Revision by webmaster (June 17, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/111_SN_1118.html?rev=49994</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;S. 1118 would amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the amount of monthly dependency and indemnity compensation payable to surviving spouses by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc4&quot;&gt; Detailed Summary &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Increases the monthly rates of veterans' dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) payable to surviving spouses through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Provides a phase-in of DIC payments in the case of veterans who die of a non-service-connected disability after being eligible for at least five years for VA compensation for a service-connected disability rated as total.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Reduces from 57 to 55 the age after which the remarriage of a surviving spouse shall not terminate DIC payments.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc5&quot;&gt; Status of the Legislation &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Latest Major Action: 5/21/2009: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc6&quot;&gt; Points in Favor &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc7&quot;&gt; Points Against &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">49994@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Revision by webmaster (May 22, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/111_SN_1118.html?rev=47978</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;S. 1118 would amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the amount of monthly dependency and indemnity compensation payable to surviving spouses by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc8&quot;&gt; Detailed Summary &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc9&quot;&gt; Status of the Legislation &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to update the status of the bill!)&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc10&quot;&gt; Points in Favor &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc11&quot;&gt; Points Against &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47978@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Revision by webmaster (May 22, 2009, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/111_SN_1118.html?rev=47979</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;S. 1118 would amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the amount of monthly dependency and indemnity compensation payable to surviving spouses by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc12&quot;&gt; Detailed Summary &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc13&quot;&gt; Status of the Legislation &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Latest Major Action: 5/21/2009: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --&gt;

&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc14&quot;&gt; Points in Favor &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;h2 id=&quot;toc15&quot;&gt; Points Against &lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47979@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Status as of May 21, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1118.html</link>
<description>5/21/2009: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">47469@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		