<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 356, The Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act of 2007</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Anon (May 11, 2008, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#34541</link>
<description>Fetal pain is a complicated subject and although it is thought that the last fibres begin appearing between 23 and 30 weeks gestation, evidence suggests these lack function before 29 weeks. Furthermore, multiple sources show strong evidence that the fetus is kept unconscious/sedated throughout pregnancy by various mediators. This is a good review: http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/294/8/947. Wikipedia also has a good general review: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_pain...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">34541@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by crispy (February 8, 2008, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#30248</link>
<description>Mr. Foshizzle Bro:  Perhaps you think that because women &quot;have experiencedd enough already&quot; we should make *all* their decisions for them?  We should avoid giving them all the facts?  -- crispy...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30248@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mdawg (February 7, 2008, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#30224</link>
<description>most women that are going to have an abortion have experiencedd enough already. 
theres no need for this bill.
this whack foshizzle bro....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">30224@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Linda (December 28, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#25757</link>
<description>Educated folks know the science of living things - nerve endings send messages to our brain regarding pain and/or pleasure. 
Preborn human beings have nerve endings and a brain. 
S356 will educate those of you who lack this knowledge. 
Maybe EVERYONE involved in abortions should not get pain medication . . . let their nerves do their thing &amp; then decide who suffers the most. 
How many pieces does Mom, doctor, nurse have to be cut into to realize it hurts? 
How much saline solution could their body take?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25757@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Amanda (October 29, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#22591</link>
<description>I completely agree with this bill.  It is not trying to persude women one way or the other, it is just allowing them to make an informative decision....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22591@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by pj (October 28, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#22565</link>
<description>if you would like to remain ignorant about pain experienced by the unborn fetus because parenthood has become more about convience than the welfare of the child you created, then that's your business. see you in hell....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22565@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Emily (October 9, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#22082</link>
<description>This bill makes me sick to my stomach. It is so in depth that it would scare people into siging this bill. I agree, it is a good idea....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22082@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sigh (May 11, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#15567</link>
<description>This is what the wingnut republican waste their time on...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15567@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shawn (May 10, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#15551</link>
<description>No way, its just a way to bully females away from choice....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15551@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Status as of May 3, 2007</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html</link>
<description>5/3/2007: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Senate Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forests . Hearings held.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">27119@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jr (April 18, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#14835</link>
<description>&quot;the pain experienced by their unborn child.&quot;

you must be joking. i am suposed to believe that the fetus suffers?...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14835@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by A.M. (April 10, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html#14715</link>
<description>This is a good thing....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14715@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Status as of January 22, 2007</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_356.html</link>
<description>1/22/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">20565@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		