http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills info@washingtonwatch.com http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1 http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2890.html#44603 I have a problem with continued bad mouthing of the Department of Veteran's affairs. They helped me in more areas than I could mention on pages here. I am thankful they exist!!! As for the holiday from gas tax.. I think we could all use it.... 44603@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2890.html#41677 Gimmick or not it would've saved the taxpayers money.... 41677@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2890.html#41543 Anyone who votes for this man is not a patriot and knows NOTHING what its like to tolerate the Dept of Veterans Affairs treatment OF veterans!!... 41543@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2890.html#41545 This Congress Pisses Off money and the TAX for Gas is to go for Roads...Look around they are NOT putting the money to the Roads!! Cut Off The Flow of Funds to these Democrat JUNKIES. I'm Mad As Hell and I'm NOT Going to Take It Anymore. VOTE McCAIN in 08.... 41545@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2890.html#41549 This moratorium on gas tax is another of those suggestions designed to make us feel good. Forget it. The expense is already in the budget, and if they don't get the money from gas taxes, they'll get it somewhere else. Remember....... THERE'S NO FREE LUNCH!!!!!... 41549@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2890.html#41557 More pandering from a political hack! How about a permanent holiday from DC,the Government and their lobbyists!... 41557@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2890.html#41567 I cannot believe the people who would not support a highway fuel tax holiday. What the heck -- we're dealing with "funny money" anyway. Funny money = meaning fiat paper money that is not backed by anything but the "faith of the People." You don't see anything wrong with that? Well, our own U.S. Constitution mandates that Congress "COIN MONEY" meaning that our money should be backed by something tangible, such as GOLD or SILVER! Each and every average family has the $10 Trillion debt hanging over their heads -- and are into it for $1/2 million in collateral. Don't you get it? Whose going to pay off this debt when all of our tax dollars are really going to just pay some of the interest on that debt?... 41567@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_2890.html?rev=23382 <p>S. 2890 would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a highway fuel tax holiday.</p> <h2 id="toc0"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>Amends the Internal Revenue Code to suspend excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels between May 26, 2008, and September 1, 2008. Provides for reimbusement from the Treasury to the Highway Trust Fund for any reduction in Trust Fund receipts resulting from such suspension.</p> <p>Expresses the policy of Congress that: (1) consumers immediately receive the benefit of the reduction in taxes resulting from this Act; and (2) transportation motor fuels producers and other dealers take necessary actions to reduce fuel prices to reflect such reduction in taxes.</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc1"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 4/17/2008: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc2"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc3"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 23382@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Sun, 04 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_2890.html?rev=22355 <p>S. 2890 would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a highway fuel tax holiday.</p> <h2 id="toc4"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc5"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to update the status of the bill!)</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc6"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc7"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 22355@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_2890.html?rev=22356 <p>S. 2890 would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a highway fuel tax holiday.</p> <h2 id="toc8"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc9"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 4/17/2008: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc10"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc11"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 22356@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2890.html 4/17/2008: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. 34773@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT