<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 225, A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the number of individuals qualifying for retroactive benefits from traumatic injury protection coverage under Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Jack Turner (August 22, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_225.html#20899</link>
<description>Absolutely Yes.  This is a no brainer.  Service is service no matter where or how and our military personnel do not have a choice where they serve or what they do.  Suffering catastrophic injuries in the military is not something you have a choice in or control over so there should not be any stratification or distinction in where or how they are injured.  We must treat our servicemembers equally with regard to the immense sacrifices they make for us and we need to extend every possible benefit.  We can never give them back their arms and legs but we can take care of them the very best we can.  We owe them that....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">20899@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Status as of January 9, 2007</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_225.html</link>
<description>1/9/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">20434@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		