WashingtonWatch.com - S. 2136, The Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2007

Revision by webmaster (July 30, 2008, 01:00:00)

Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EDT

S. 2136 would address the treatment of primary mortgages in bankruptcy.

Detailed Summary

Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act of 2007 - Amends federal bankruptcy law to permit a bankruptcy plan to: (1) modify a loan secured by the principal residence (mortgage) of a chapter 13 debtor (individual with regular income); and (2) provide for payment of such loan at a fixed annual percentage rate of interest, over a 30-year period.

Exempts a chapter 13 debtor from the requirement for credit counseling if the court receives certification that debtor's principal residence has been scheduled for a foreclosure sale.

Conditions any fees, costs, or charges that may be added to the mortgage debt during pendency of the bankruptcy case upon notice to the court within a specified deadline.

Requires the court to waive such additional fees, costs, or charges if the court has not been notified on time.

Permits a bankruptcy plan to provide for waiver of any prepayment penalty contained on a claim secured by debtor's principal residence.

Authorizes the trustee in bankruptcy to request joinder or substitution for the debtor as the real party in interest in any action in state or federal court with respect to a claim or defense asserted by an individual debtor that was not scheduled in the debtor's petition. Permits the debtor to proceed as the real party in interest if the trustee does not make such a request.

Amends the judicial code to authorize the court in any core proceeding under bankruptcy law to hear and determine a proceeding in lieu of referral to arbitration if the case involves an individual debtor whose debts are primarily consumer debts.

Exempts from the estate in bankruptcy up to $75,000 of the debtor's aggregate interest in real property used as debtor's principal residence if the debtor is age 55 or older.

Prohibits the court from allowing a claim that is subject to any remedy for damages or rescission due to failure to comply with the Truth in Lending Act or any other state or federal consumer protection law.

Status of the Legislation

Latest Major Action: 7/29/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 911.

Points in Favor

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)

Points Against

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)

Status as of July 29, 2008

Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EDT

7/29/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 911.

Comment by Smith (May 5, 2008, 01:00:00)

Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT

I concur, LT. The government is not our mother....

Comment by LT. (May 5, 2008, 01:00:00)

Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT

Oh, Boo Hoo gentlemen. Everyone is responsible for their own actions. Over 95% of all mortages are being paid. You want to bailout the "flippers. Let the open market take care of them, they just lost on a bet. get over it. The govt. is not our Mommy....

Comment by Mia (May 5, 2008, 01:00:00)

Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT

I agree with LT. The majority of Americans are responsible and don't blame others for their problems. Just like with health care: they want to change to a socialist system for 10% of the population that have trouble. Deal with the 10% not the rest of us. Government is the problem, not the solution....

Comment by Jim (May 5, 2008, 01:00:00)

Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT

You do not see any problem with unduly protecting banks by a provision which promotes corrupted policies. I will let you know now that this will change once this legislation passes. Work for a living and stop stealing money from honest people! Remove title 11 section 1322(b)(2)...

Comment by Jim (April 25, 2008, 01:00:00)

Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT

HR 3609 is better legislation than how this legislation is written. After rereading this legislation this version does not hit the nail on the head but pounds on the neighboring structures. 1322(b)(2) is not directly cleared out as it is with HR 3609....

Comment by Jim (April 13, 2008, 01:00:00)

Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT

The below Senators plus all Republican Senators have voted to table hr3221 amendment with similar provisions of this bill. For elections coming up these Senators are working for the bankers instead of the homeowner. IMO Lieberman (ID-CT) Baucus (D-MT) Byrd (D-WV) Carper (D-DE) Johnson (D-SD) Landrieu (D-LA) Lincoln (D-AR) McCaskill (D-MO) Nelson (D-NE) Tester (D-MT) With 9 dissenting Democratic Senators and all dissenting Republican Senators, it is a bit clearer why this legislation is so stagnated....

Comment by Jim (April 6, 2008, 01:00:00)

Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT

Part 1: I found out that our other Senator Voinovich somehow believes that 1322(b)(2) keeps us in lower interest loans by reducing the risk to lenders. Well, maybe it reduces the risk to lender, however it does not promote lower interest rates or cause interest rates to rise. Interest rates will rise regardless if people lose their dwellings and the loans become only 66% recover for the banks and also consume 5 grand or there about in order to obtain possession of the properties in foreclosure....

Comment by Jim (April 6, 2008, 01:00:00)

Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT

part 2: With 1322(b)(2) stricken as it promotes bad lending practices as is demonstrated by the bailout of Bear Sterns and the massive financial losses to all but CEOs and other controlling figures. Striking this provision which only allows no fear of loan modifications in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy only allows 600 thousand homeowners to not be able to at least give back the home value at an interest rate which will return at least a fair return on the investment. It appears that this standalone version of the bill needs to be passed so that the greedy lenders and corrupt politicians can devour homeowners as simple market corrections....

Comment by Jim (April 6, 2008, 01:00:00)

Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT

Correction: This bill needs passed so that lenders and paid off by other than the constituents who these politicians are supposed to represent do not increase losses in our financial community, depose 600 thousand Americans as homeowners and still allow lenders to be free from negotiating loan terms before bankruptcy so they can prevent bankruptcies and acceptance of bad lending practices as an acceptable practice. It is not an acceptable practice....

Comment by Jim (April 4, 2008, 01:00:00)

Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT

It appears that there are 10 Democratic Senators who are also bought and paid for as are most GOP Senators that are preventing this badly needed legislation from getting through the Senate. Including this legislation as Title IV in s.2636 demonstrates just how corrupted the Senate is. This corrupted element not only damages the confidence the American people have about Congress, it also defeats the positive efforts set forth by Durbin, Obama, Clinton and one of my Senators Sherrod Brown from propelling this legislation through the withered Congress. Of course the only way to cleanse the system would be to replace the corrupted officials or to at least make it less possible for those that are being purchased by big money from profiting from their legislative sabotages....

Status as of April 3, 2008

Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT

4/3/2008: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on the Judiciary. Date of scheduled consideration. SD-226. 10:00 a.m.

Revision by webmaster (April 1, 2008, 01:00:00)

Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EDT

S. 2136 would address the treatment of primary mortgages in bankruptcy.

Detailed Summary

Exempts a chapter 13 debtor from the requirement for credit counseling if the court receives certification that debtor's principal residence has been scheduled for a foreclosure sale.

Conditions any fees, costs, or charges that may be added to the mortgage debt during pendency of the bankruptcy case upon notice to the court within a specified deadline.

Requires the court to waive such additional fees, costs, or charges if the court has not been notified on time.

Permits a bankruptcy plan to provide for waiver of any prepayment penalty contained on a claim secured by debtor's principal residence.

Exempts from the estate in bankruptcy up to $75,000 of the debtor's aggregate interest in real property used as debtor's principal residence if the debtor is age 55 or older.

Status of the Legislation

Latest Major Action: 4/3/2008: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on the Judiciary. Date of scheduled consideration. SD-226. 10:00 a.m.

Points in Favor

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)

Points Against

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)

Comment by Jim (March 14, 2008, 01:00:00)

Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 EDT

You would think this legislation or s.2636 would get higher priority attention since the crisis will not get better and damages would be headed off if this legislation was passed into law. hat are they waiting for? Easter is a short time away, so they can proceed if the holdup was waiting for Easter....

Comment by Jim (February 22, 2008, 01:00:00)

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST

Since both remaining Democratic candidates support this issue and no Republican Representative, President or Senator supports this issue, it becomes part of the debates for our next presidential and the legislative selection for the next election. It is obvious that the Republican party is not concerned too greatly with saving families from foreclosure....

Comment by Jim (February 16, 2008, 01:00:00)

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST

This bill will help out people that were taken advantage of by the lending industry with loans with terms that are unfeasible once the affordable payment period expires. The limitation of title 11 in 1322(b)(2) is preventing homeowners from being able to save their homes once their loans are above their means. Having the loans removed from no touch condition to modification to conventional plus a risk premium will save a lot of homes and allow people to get back on their financial feet again. Without the striking of 1322(b)(2) making and completing a Chapter 13 plan is impossible or very difficult in most cases. This should increase completion of chapter 13 plans and add fairness to the code....

Revision by webmaster (December 6, 2007, 01:00:00)

Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 EST

S. 2136 would address the treatment of primary mortgages in bankruptcy.

Detailed Summary

Exempts a chapter 13 debtor from the requirement for credit counseling if the court receives certification that debtor's principal residence has been scheduled for a foreclosure sale.

Conditions any fees, costs, or charges that may be added to the mortgage debt during pendency of the bankruptcy case upon notice to the court within a specified deadline.

Requires the court to waive such additional fees, costs, or charges if the court has not been notified on time.

Permits a bankruptcy plan to provide for waiver of any prepayment penalty contained on a claim secured by debtor's principal residence.

Exempts from the estate in bankruptcy up to $75,000 of the debtor's aggregate interest in real property used as debtor's principal residence if the debtor is age 55 or older.

Status of the Legislation

Latest Major Action: 12/5/2007: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on the Judiciary. Hearings held.

Points in Favor

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)

Points Against

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)

Status as of December 5, 2007

Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 EST

12/5/2007: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on the Judiciary. Hearings held.

Revision by webmaster (November 21, 2007, 01:00:00)

Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:00:00 EST

S. 2136 would address the treatment of primary mortgages in bankruptcy.

Detailed Summary

Exempts a chapter 13 debtor from the requirement for credit counseling if the court receives certification that debtor's principal residence has been scheduled for a foreclosure sale.

Conditions any fees, costs, or charges that may be added to the mortgage debt during pendency of the bankruptcy case upon notice to the court within a specified deadline.

Requires the court to waive such additional fees, costs, or charges if the court has not been notified on time.

Permits a bankruptcy plan to provide for waiver of any prepayment penalty contained on a claim secured by debtor's principal residence.

Exempts from the estate in bankruptcy up to $75,000 of the debtor's aggregate interest in real property used as debtor's principal residence if the debtor is age 55 or older.

Status of the Legislation

Latest Major Action: 10/3/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Points in Favor

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)

Points Against

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)

Revision by webmaster (October 22, 2007, 01:00:00)

Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT

S. 2136 would address the treatment of primary mortgages in bankruptcy.

Detailed Summary

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)

Status of the Legislation

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to update the status of the bill!)

Points in Favor

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)

Points Against

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)

Revision by webmaster (October 22, 2007, 01:00:00)

Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT

S. 2136 would address the treatment of primary mortgages in bankruptcy.

Detailed Summary

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)

Status of the Legislation

Latest Major Action: 10/3/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Points in Favor

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)

Points Against

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)

Status as of October 3, 2007

Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT

10/3/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Status as of October 3, 2007

Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT

10/3/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.