http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills info@washingtonwatch.com http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1 http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1638.html#40195 The quality of Judges is outstanding and their pay is a disgrace. Average attorneys appearing before them make 2 or 3 times their salary.... 40195@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1638.html#40196 If you want the brightest and the best securing citzens rights, we need to incease the salary of these judges.... 40196@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1638.html#39630 Much needed to keep the quality of jurist we need on the bench!... 39630@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1638.html#26038 This is nothing more than a thinly-veiled attempt to buy the courts. BAD IDEA.... 26038@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 EST http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1638.html?rev=3845 <p>S. 1638 would adjust the salaries of Federal justices and judges.</p> <h2 id="toc0"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>Federal Judicial Salary Restoration Act of 2007 - Increases the salaries of certain federal judges and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc1"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 6/15/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc2"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc3"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 3845@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1638.html?rev=1284 <p>S. 1638 would adjust the salaries of Federal justices and judges.</p> <h2 id="toc4"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc5"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to update the status of the bill!)</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc6"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc7"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 1284@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_SN_1638.html?rev=1285 <p>S. 1638 would adjust the salaries of Federal justices and judges.</p> <h2 id="toc8"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc9"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 6/15/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc10"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc11"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 1285@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Sat, 16 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1638.html 6/15/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. 22373@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EDT