<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 1235, The Daniel Faulkner Law Enforcement Officers and Judges Protection Act of 2007</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by FL (October 30, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1235.html#22618</link>
<description>Anytime you talk about increasing penalties and limiting damages for felons against LEO's in the performance of their duties you should have 100% support from everyone except the criminals. The fact that a thug can file a lawsuit against LEO’S in the defense of self/the performance of their duties, you see where society went wrong. The fact that any LEO is discouraged from carrying a firearm is a disgrace. Not only are they sacrificing their own safety but they endanger the public by virtue of the fact they are unarmed....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22618@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Pete Hanson (October 28, 2007, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1235.html#22562</link>
<description>I am in favor of this bill. As a federal correctional officer, I personally do not foresee the need for myself to carry a firearm off duty, but I live in a rural area that has a very low crime rate. After seeing on newsclips the things that DO occur with officers in metropolitan areas, I am glad that this bill has come to light....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">22562@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Status as of April 26, 2007</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1235.html</link>
<description>4/26/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">21446@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		