http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills info@washingtonwatch.com http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1 http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html#41659 NO; We need to stop! Look! and listen! Most of these cases have been false ly convicted!! Listen to the unlikely lies an ex has given to convict a man she no longer cares about. Like a made up fictional character or wearing make up and a dress? make sure that these people accused of these hanus crimes are actually innocent before giving up on them. appeals take too long and there is no other way to clear your name after you have been convicted. Noone will give them a chance. the only thing prosecutors look for are cases they can win!! it doesnt matter if they are innocent. They need to fill that hole where the money is no longer coming in at. The more people in prison the greater the amount of money they will get from the state and the FASTER THEY WILL MOVE UP THE LADDER ON THE POINT SYSTEM TO BECIOME JUDGE There is no longer truth in this justice system. I say NO set them free as you would any other wrongfully convicted criminal. Keep Fighting... 41659@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html#40826 Darlene Im totally with you my man was accused of this from his ex and she is out free and she really did this crime and the boy turned her in and the cop laughed because he thinks that we are having a vandictive motive but we do not we just know that she did this and clark county has wrongly convicted this man so we are trying to fight.... 40826@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html#37831 Two wrongs don't make a right! There are women out there that dont care that their child have a father! They will do anything to prevent that from happening so fathers cant get custody, even if it means convicting an ex of false allegations. I am not referring to the true convicts of molestation. God knows we understand there are true child molestors that are being released, but there are also falsely convicted men in prison that should not be there at all. Just give the whole justice system a total rehaul, STOP convicting innocent men. True molestors should not be released. You right that is a problem but so is falsely convicted men of child molestation.... 37831@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html#37052 Darlene - that is a problem. But do you know how many children are abused by recidivist sex offenders who are only getting parole? Here's one, which was exposed today: http://wral.com/news/news_briefs/story/3034625/. Trust me, there's many more where that came from.... 37052@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html#35475 Do you have any idea how many fathers are being falsely convicted of molesting their own children in order for them to lose custody to an ex?... 35475@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html#30342 I want to know about this bill.... 30342@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html 10/4/2007: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. 27446@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_HR_2106.html?rev=7189 <p>H.R. 2106 would ensure that sex offenders and sexually violent predators are not eligible for parole.</p> <h2 id="toc0"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>No Parole for Sex Offenders Act - Requires a state that is receiving funds for certain law enforcement assistance programs under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to put into effect laws and policies that prohibit parole for any individual convicted of a crime against a minor and any sexually violent predator. Grants states three years to implement such laws and policies (with one additional two-year extension for states making good faith efforts at implementation). Renders any state that does not implement such laws and policies within the required period ineligible for 10% of funding for its law enforcement assistance programs.</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc1"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007: Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc2"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc3"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 7189@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_HR_2106.html?rev=2085 <p>H.R. 2106 would ensure that sex offenders and sexually violent predators are not eligible for parole.</p> <h2 id="toc4"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>No Parole for Sex Offenders Act - Requires a state that is receiving funds for certain law enforcement assistance programs under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to put into effect laws and policies that prohibit parole for any individual convicted of a crime against a minor and any sexually violent predator. Grants states three years to implement such laws and policies (with one additional two-year extension for states making good faith efforts at implementation). Renders any state that does not implement such laws and policies within the required period ineligible for 10% of funding for its law enforcement assistance programs.</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc5"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 5/2/2007: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc6"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc7"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 2085@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/history/110_HR_2106.html?rev=2086 <p>H.R. 2106 would ensure that sex offenders and sexually violent predators are not eligible for parole.</p> <h2 id="toc8"> Detailed Summary </h2> <p>No Parole for Sex Offenders Act - Requires a state that is receiving funds for certain law enforcement assistance programs under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to put into effect laws and policies that prohibit parole for any individual convicted of a crime against a minor and any sexually violent predator. Grants states three years to implement such laws and policies (with one additional two-year extension for states making good faith efforts at implementation). Renders any state that does not implement such laws and policies within the required period ineligible for 10% of funding for its law enforcement assistance programs.</p> <!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc9"> Status of the Legislation </h2> <p>Latest Major Action: 6/4/2007: Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.</p> <!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. --> <h2 id="toc10"> Points in Favor </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> <h2 id="toc11"> Points Against </h2> <p>(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)<br /> <!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! --> </p> 2086@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html 6/4/2007: Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. 22668@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html 6/4/2007: Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. 29675@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_2106.html 5/2/2007: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. 19697@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 EDT