http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills info@washingtonwatch.com http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1 http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1375.html#40702 I've written to both committee's HOLDING this bill from coming to the floor and have (3 times ) not received an answer to my questions. " I would like to know why HR 689 is stuck in your comittee for more than a whole year? Here is a chance to hold down spending and you are not doing anything about it. No wonder there is a hew and cry for TERM LIMITS. You people in Washington do not do your job. I would appreciate a return letter stating the reason this bill has been delayed for so long AND the reasoning had better stand up to scrutiny. I would appreciate the PRO's and CON's of your committee's thinking." Fred Golden TERM LIMITS should be on a ballot.... 40702@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 EDT http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_1375.html 3/7/2007: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. 18966@http://www.washingtonwatch.com Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 EST