<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

      <rss version="2.0">		
        <channel>
          <title>WashingtonWatch.com - H.R. 4844, The Federal Election Integrity Act of 2006</title>
          <link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills</link>
          <description></description>
          <managingEditor>info@washingtonwatch.com</managingEditor>
          <generator>http://www.pjdoland.com/chai/?v=0.1</generator>
          
<item>
<title>Comment by Me (November 15, 2006, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/109_HR_4844.html#13249</link>
<description>I don\'t think this bill would do anything more then help create a surveillance State.  We have too much of that already....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13249@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by howard (October 19, 2006, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/109_HR_4844.html#10359</link>
<description>with the u s a 9 trillion dollars in debt , yes , we need to know that our vote counts. reaganomics and this bushie guy are killing us. they keep saying it , that the debt does not matter , that what is important is that the dow jones is at record highs. yes , sure , hoover was also saying this in 1932 , until people woke up and kicked him out on his butt....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10359@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Charlie (October 3, 2006, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/109_HR_4844.html#7356</link>
<description>This bill would not reduce fraudulent voting.  What it would do is make it more diffecult for seniors and other legitamate voters to vote.  The best way to reduce fraudulent voting is to pass a bill which would result in a paper trail including paper reciepts for the votes you cast, opening computer softwar to inspection by election officials, and force recounts when certain red flags occur, including results vastly different from exit polls or machines which counted more votes than there are voters in a district....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">7356@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Fred (October 3, 2006, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/109_HR_4844.html#7370</link>
<description>This bill is opposed by the left because dead &amp; illegals will no longer be able to vote for them....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">7370@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Donna (September 23, 2006, 01:00:00)</title>
<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/109_HR_4844.html#6735</link>
<description>I think it is a great idea. We are already required to produce 2 forms of ID when we start a new job. This only requires one. And I don't want my vote cancelled out by someone voting fraudulently....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6735@http://www.washingtonwatch.com</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
        </channel>
      </rss>
  		