How People Voted
45% For, 55% Against
11 votes cast
Take Action
 |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
 |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Organize | |
|
Start A Petition |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
P.L. 112-84, To protect the safety of judges by extending the authority of the Judicial Conference to redact sensitive information contained in their financial disclosure reports, and for other purposes
- This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on December 21, 2011, 06:49:57 (webmaster), with revision saved on January 1, 2012, 18:50:19 (webmaster):
H.R. 1059 would protect the safety of judges by extending the authority of the Judicial Conference to redact sensitive information contained in their financial disclosure reports.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
Latest Major Action: 12/20/2011: Resolving differences -- House actions. Status: On motion that the House suspend the rules and agree12/23/2011: Presented to the Senate amendment Agreed to by voice vote.President.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Costs: $ per
and increases their $ share of the national debt by $.
(source: Congressional Budget Office)
Learn More
There was no up-or-down vote in the House.
There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.
Visitor Comments
There are currently no comments for this bill
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
From the Blog
WashingtonWatch.com Digest – August 1, 2011
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of August 1, 2011. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Legislators Earn 3x the Average American Despite the job they do, members of C...WashingtonWatch.com Digest – November 7, 2011
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of November 7, 2011. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Paying for Tax Reduction Widely agreed-upon legislation may get held...WashingtonWatch.com Digest – January 9, 2012
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of January 9, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend |wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Biometrics and Congress While parts of the government worry about the ...Public Service and Privacy
Just before Congress left town for the August recess, it passed a bill to slam the brakes on implementation of the STOCK Act. That’s Public Law 112-105, the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012. Congress passed the law under pressu...