P.L. 112-136, To correct a technical error in Public Law 112-122
- This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
There was no up-or-down vote in the House.
There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.
Visitor Comments
There are currently no comments for this bill
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
From the Blog
Our Error-Prone Congress
It all started when Congress passed the “_______Act of______.” In their haste to get a bill passed and get out of town for the August (2010) recess, the House and Senate left blank the lines where they were supposed to give the common name ...WashingtonWatch.com Digest – June 25, 2012
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of June 25, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Congressional Errors Congress recently needed a “do-over” t...