Warning: assert() [function.assert]: Assertion failed in /vol/home/washingtonwatch/washingtonwatch.com/htdocs/Text_Diff-0.2.1/Diff/Engine/native.php on line 248

Warning: assert() [function.assert]: Assertion failed in /vol/home/washingtonwatch/washingtonwatch.com/htdocs/Text_Diff-0.2.1/Diff/Engine/native.php on line 248

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /vol/home/washingtonwatch/washingtonwatch.com/htdocs/Text_Diff-0.2.1/Diff/Engine/native.php:248) in /vol/home/washingtonwatch/washingtonwatch.com/htdocs/classes/page.class.php on line 70
P.L. 112-123, The National Flood Insurance Program Extension Act - Washington Watch

Home

Blog

How People Voted

50% For, 50% Against
6 votes cast

P.L. 112-123, The National Flood Insurance Program Extension Act

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on May 17, 2012, 18:31:11 (webmaster), with revision saved on May 18, 2012, 06:31:15 (webmaster):

H.R. 5740 would extend the National Flood Insurance Program.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 5/16/2012: House floor actions.5/17/2012: Passed/agreed to in House. Status: AtOn motion to suspend the conclusion of debate, the Yeasrules and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant topass the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings onbill Agreed to by the motion would be postponed.Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 402 - 18 (Roll no. 262).
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Learn More

  • House Vote

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.

From the Blog

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – June 4, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of June 3, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Foreign Affairs Spending With spending bills on the subject moving in th...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)